GSSR - Global Social Sciences Review

SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF URDU CASE CLITICS AS POSTPOSITIONS IN COMPARISON WITH ENGLISH PREPOSITIONS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2024(IX-I).01 10.31703/gssr.2024(IX-I).01
Authored by : Sana Mahmood QureshiHashmi

01 Pages : 1-9

References

Butt, M. (2005). Differential Case Marking Theory (DCT). University of Konstanz. Germany.
Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2004). The Status of Case. In: Dayal, V., Mahajan, A. (eds). Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 61. Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2719-2_6
DeArmond, R. (2004). Syntax. Simon Fraser University. http://doi.org/www.sfu.ca/~dearmond/322/course.outline.322.main.htm
Hardegree, G. (2009). Compositional Semantics. UMass Amherst Publishers. Massachusetts. USA
Libert, A. R. (2006). Ambipositions. Lincom Publishers. Palmer, F. (1984). Grammar. Penguin Books. England.
Pervaiz, A., & Bukhari, D. N. H. (2016). The Acquisition of English Language Syntactic Structures by Urdu L1 Speakers in Pakistan: The Case Study of Articles. University of Sargodha. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pervaiz_Azhar/publication/329268678_The_Acquisition_of_English_Language_Syntactic_Structures_by_Urdu_L1_Speakers_in_Pakistan_The_Case_ of_Articles/links/5bfff1a0299bf1a3c155fec2/The-Acquisition-of-English-Language-Syntactic-Structures-by-Urdu-L1-Speakers-in-Pakistan-The-Case-of-Articles.pdf
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge University Press.
Rhee, S. (2004). A Comparative Analysis of Grammaticalization of English and Korean Adpositions. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. Studies in Modern Grammar. 40. 195- 214. http://doi.org/srhee.net/en/NFUpload/nfupload_down.php?tmp_name=100.pdf&name=100.pdf&PHPSESSID=27674f48d15d7cc0b291833c38cd2133
Rizvi, S. M. J. (2007). Development of Algorithms and Computational Grammar for Urdu. Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
Zeb, F. (2019). Nominative and Accusative Cases in English and Urdu: A Comparative Study. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 7(4). 365-377.

References

Butt, M. (2005). Differential Case Marking Theory (DCT). University of Konstanz. Germany.
Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2004). The Status of Case. In: Dayal, V., Mahajan, A. (eds). Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 61. Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2719-2_6
DeArmond, R. (2004). Syntax. Simon Fraser University. http://doi.org/www.sfu.ca/~dearmond/322/course.outline.322.main.htm
Hardegree, G. (2009). Compositional Semantics. UMass Amherst Publishers. Massachusetts. USA
Libert, A. R. (2006). Ambipositions. Lincom Publishers. Palmer, F. (1984). Grammar. Penguin Books. England.
Pervaiz, A., & Bukhari, D. N. H. (2016). The Acquisition of English Language Syntactic Structures by Urdu L1 Speakers in Pakistan: The Case Study of Articles. University of Sargodha. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pervaiz_Azhar/publication/329268678_The_Acquisition_of_English_Language_Syntactic_Structures_by_Urdu_L1_Speakers_in_Pakistan_The_Case_ of_Articles/links/5bfff1a0299bf1a3c155fec2/The-Acquisition-of-English-Language-Syntactic-Structures-by-Urdu-L1-Speakers-in-Pakistan-The-Case-of-Articles.pdf
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge University Press.
Rhee, S. (2004). A Comparative Analysis of Grammaticalization of English and Korean Adpositions. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. Studies in Modern Grammar. 40. 195- 214. http://doi.org/srhee.net/en/NFUpload/nfupload_down.php?tmp_name=100.pdf&name=100.pdf&PHPSESSID=27674f48d15d7cc0b291833c38cd2133
Rizvi, S. M. J. (2007). Development of Algorithms and Computational Grammar for Urdu. Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
Zeb, F. (2019). Nominative and Accusative Cases in English and Urdu: A Comparative Study. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 7(4). 365-377.