METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE A CORPUSASSISTED STUDY OF HEDGES AND BOOSTERS IN BENAZIR BHUTTOS SPEECHES

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).06      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).06      Published : Sep 3
Authored by : Arshad Ali , Athar Rashid , Shahid Abbas

06 Pages : 56-63

References

  • Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English: Annelie Adel, vol. 24. John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  • Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4. 3)[Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.
  • Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan'spolitical speech. ARECLS, Vol.7, pp 23-40.
  • Dictionary, O. E. (1989). Oxford english dictionary. Simpson, JA & Weiner, ESC.
  • Esmer, E. (2017). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in Turkish Election Rally Speeches Delivered by Pro-Turkish and Pro- Kurdish Leaders. Athens Journal of Social Sciences- Volume 4, Issue 4 - Pages 367-384.
  • Gholami, M., Tajalli, G., & Shokrpour, N. (2014). An investigation of metadiscourse markers in English medical texts and their Persian translation based on Hyland's model. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 1-41.
  • Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, Vol.17(2), p. 433-454.
  • Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18(1), 3-26.
  • Ismail, H. M. (2012). Discourse markers in political speeches: Forms and functions. Journal of College of Education for Women, Vol.23(4), p. 1260-1278.
  • Kan, M. O. (2016). The Use of Interactional Metadiscourse: A Comparison of Articles on Turkish Education and Literature. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. Vol. 16(5), p. 1639- 1648.
  • Kopple, V. W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, Vol.36, p. 82-93.
  • Mai, H. (2016). An Intercultural Analysis of Meta-discourse Markers as Persuasive Power in Chinese and American Political Speeches. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 4 (6), p. 207-219.
  • Markus, M. (2006). An analysis of the use of rhetorical devices in Gordon Brown's speech to theLabor Party Conference, on September 25, 2006. Interaction and Persuasion.
  • McClay, R. (2017). Us and Them: A Descriptive Analysis of Donald Trump's Campaign Speeches by Robert McClay (master's thesis). College of Arts and Law of the University of Birmingham
  • Memon, Z., Bughio, F, A., & Gopang, I. B. (2014). Critical analysis of Political discourse: A study of Benazir Bhutto's last speech. Balochistan Journal of Linguistics, 2.71-87.
  • Siddique, A. R., Mahmood, M. A., & Iqbal, J. (2018). Metadiscourse Analysis of Pakistani English Newspaper Editorials: A Corpus-Based Study. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 8, No. 1; 2018 ISSN 1923-869X E-ISSN 1923-8703
  • Toska, B. (2013). Under Hedging Discourse and Creating a Political Image with Barack Obama. Language and Literature - European Landmarks of Identity. Vol. 13, p. 78-86.
  • Yazdani, S., Sharifi, S., & Elyassi, M. (2014). Exploring Hedges and Boosters in 9/11 English Front Page News Articles. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 4(3), p. 301-313.

References

  • Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English: Annelie Adel, vol. 24. John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  • Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4. 3)[Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.
  • Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan'spolitical speech. ARECLS, Vol.7, pp 23-40.
  • Dictionary, O. E. (1989). Oxford english dictionary. Simpson, JA & Weiner, ESC.
  • Esmer, E. (2017). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in Turkish Election Rally Speeches Delivered by Pro-Turkish and Pro- Kurdish Leaders. Athens Journal of Social Sciences- Volume 4, Issue 4 - Pages 367-384.
  • Gholami, M., Tajalli, G., & Shokrpour, N. (2014). An investigation of metadiscourse markers in English medical texts and their Persian translation based on Hyland's model. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 1-41.
  • Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, Vol.17(2), p. 433-454.
  • Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18(1), 3-26.
  • Ismail, H. M. (2012). Discourse markers in political speeches: Forms and functions. Journal of College of Education for Women, Vol.23(4), p. 1260-1278.
  • Kan, M. O. (2016). The Use of Interactional Metadiscourse: A Comparison of Articles on Turkish Education and Literature. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. Vol. 16(5), p. 1639- 1648.
  • Kopple, V. W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, Vol.36, p. 82-93.
  • Mai, H. (2016). An Intercultural Analysis of Meta-discourse Markers as Persuasive Power in Chinese and American Political Speeches. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 4 (6), p. 207-219.
  • Markus, M. (2006). An analysis of the use of rhetorical devices in Gordon Brown's speech to theLabor Party Conference, on September 25, 2006. Interaction and Persuasion.
  • McClay, R. (2017). Us and Them: A Descriptive Analysis of Donald Trump's Campaign Speeches by Robert McClay (master's thesis). College of Arts and Law of the University of Birmingham
  • Memon, Z., Bughio, F, A., & Gopang, I. B. (2014). Critical analysis of Political discourse: A study of Benazir Bhutto's last speech. Balochistan Journal of Linguistics, 2.71-87.
  • Siddique, A. R., Mahmood, M. A., & Iqbal, J. (2018). Metadiscourse Analysis of Pakistani English Newspaper Editorials: A Corpus-Based Study. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 8, No. 1; 2018 ISSN 1923-869X E-ISSN 1923-8703
  • Toska, B. (2013). Under Hedging Discourse and Creating a Political Image with Barack Obama. Language and Literature - European Landmarks of Identity. Vol. 13, p. 78-86.
  • Yazdani, S., Sharifi, S., & Elyassi, M. (2014). Exploring Hedges and Boosters in 9/11 English Front Page News Articles. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 4(3), p. 301-313.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Ali, A., Rashid, A., & Abbas, S. (2020). Metadiscourse Markers in Political Discourse: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Hedges and Boosters in Benazir Bhutto's Speeches. Global Social Sciences Review, V(III), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).06

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Ali, Arshad, Athar Rashid, and Shahid Abbas. 2020. "Metadiscourse Markers in Political Discourse: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Hedges and Boosters in Benazir Bhutto's Speeches." Global Social Sciences Review, V (III): 56-63 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).06

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ALI, A., RASHID, A. & ABBAS, S. 2020. Metadiscourse Markers in Political Discourse: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Hedges and Boosters in Benazir Bhutto's Speeches. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 56-63.

MHRA

    MHRA : Ali, Arshad, Athar Rashid, and Shahid Abbas. 2020. "Metadiscourse Markers in Political Discourse: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Hedges and Boosters in Benazir Bhutto's Speeches." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 56-63

MLA

    MLA : Ali, Arshad, Athar Rashid, and Shahid Abbas. "Metadiscourse Markers in Political Discourse: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Hedges and Boosters in Benazir Bhutto's Speeches." Global Social Sciences Review, V.III (2020): 56-63 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Ali, Arshad, Rashid, Athar, and Abbas, Shahid (2020), "Metadiscourse Markers in Political Discourse: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Hedges and Boosters in Benazir Bhutto's Speeches", Global Social Sciences Review, V (III), 56-63

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Ali, Arshad, Athar Rashid, and Shahid Abbas. "Metadiscourse Markers in Political Discourse: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Hedges and Boosters in Benazir Bhutto's Speeches." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. III (2020): 56-63. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).06