COLLABORATION TREND AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE RESEARCH

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-III).02      10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-III).02      Published : Sep 3
Authored by : MuhammadAsif , Khalid Mahmood , Alia Arshad

02 Pages : 10-21

References

  • Abbasi, A., Chung, K. S. K., & Hossain, L. (2012). Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position, and performance. Information Processing & Management, 48(4), 671-679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2011.09.001.
  • Abbasi, A., Jalili, M., & Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. (2018). Influence of network-based structural and power diversity on research performance. Scientometrics, 117(1), 579-590, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2879-3
  • Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 746- 761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003
  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level, top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 204-213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.11.002
  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.
  • Ahmed, A., Mastura, A., Ghafar, N. A., Muhammad, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2016). Impact of article page count and number of authors on citations in disability related fields: a systematic review article. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 45(9), 1118.
  • Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 62, 13-30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.05.003
  • Annalingam, A., Damayanthi, H., Jayawardena, R., & Ranasinghe, P. (2014). Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. Springerplus, 3(1), 140, https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-140
  • ntoniou, G. A., Antoniou, S. A., Georgakarakos, E. I., Sfyroeras, G. S., & Georgiadis, G. S. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. Annals of vascular surgery, 29(2), 286-292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.09.017
  • rif, T., Ali, R., & Asger, M. (2012). Scientific co- authorship social networks: A case study of computer science scenario in India. International Journal of Computer Applications, 52(12), https://doi.org/10.5120/8257-1790
  • Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B., & Díaz-Faes, A. A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 135-144, ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001
  • Bornmann, L. (2017). Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 1036-1047, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23728
  • Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the- art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1-67, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961- 012-9281-8
  • Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying research collaboration: A literature review. All Sprouts, 10(3).
  • Cantner, U., & Rake, B. (2014). International research networks in pharmaceuticals: Structure and dynamics. Research Policy, 43(2), 333-348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.016
  • Chuan-yi, W., & Chen, C. (2017). The Effect of Co-authorship Network on ResearchPerformance of Scholars: A Correlation Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing, (31), ACM
  • Eniayejuni, A. (2018). Impact of Scientific Productivity and Trend on Publication Output of Nigerian Authors in Web of Science from 2006 to 2016. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 28(1),
  • Eslami, H., Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2013). Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: the case of biotechnology in Canada. Scientometrics, 97(1), 99-119, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1069-6
  • Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 222-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.005
  • Hoonlor, A., Szymanski, B. K., & Zaki, M. J. (2013). Trends in computer science research. Communications of the ACM, 56(10), 74-83.
  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. [journal article]. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189-202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3
  • Iglič, H., Doreian, P., Kronegger, L., & Ferligoj, A. (2017). With whom do researchers collaborate and why? Scientometrics, 112(1), 153-174.
  • Ivancheva, L. (2008). Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 47-56.
  • Kahn, M. (2018). Co-authorship as a proxy for collaboration: a cautionary tale. Science and Public Policy, 45(1), 117-123, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx052
  • Khan, B., Robbins, C., Rotermund, S. L., Falkenheim, J. C., Burke, A., Boroush, M., et al. (2016). Science & Engineering Indicators 2016. Washington, DC: National Science Board.
  • Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2013). Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980–2010. [journal article]. Scientometrics, 97(3), 491- 517, ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013- 0994-8
  • Kumar, S., & Mohd. Jan, J. (2014). Relationship between authors’ structural position in the collaboration network and research productivity: Case of Indian earth scientists. Program, 48(4), 355-369, https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2013-0002
  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co- authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15, https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776961
  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131, ttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001c). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 98(2), 404-409, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
  • Osareh, F., Khademi, R., Rostami, M. K., & Shirazi, M. S. (2014). Co-authorship network structure analysis of Iranian researchers’ scientific outputs from 1991 to 2013 based on the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 8(2), 263-271, https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2014.1015301
  • Puuska, H.-M., Muhonen, R., & Leino, Y. (2014). International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines. Scientometrics, 98(2), 823-839, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1181-7
  • Sabah, F., Hassan, S.-U., Muazzam, A., Iqbal, S., Soroya, S. H., & Sarwar, R. (2018). Scientific collaboration networks in Pakistan and their impact on institutional research performance: A case study based on Scopus publications. Library hi tech, 37(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2018-0036
  • Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Research Collaboration in Saudi Arabia 1980–2014: Bibliometric Patterns and National Policy to Foster Research Quantity and Quality. Libri, 66,
  • Shrum, W., Genuth, J., Carlson, W. B., Chompalov, I., & Bijker, W. E. (2007). Structures of scientific collaboration. London: MIT Press.
  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2126-z
  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2017). Do types of collaboration change citation? A scientometric analysis of social science publications in South Africa. Scientometrics, 111(1), 379-400, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2265-6
  • The World Bank (2019). "World Bank Country and Lending Groups." https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.
  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

References

  • Abbasi, A., Chung, K. S. K., & Hossain, L. (2012). Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position, and performance. Information Processing & Management, 48(4), 671-679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2011.09.001.
  • Abbasi, A., Jalili, M., & Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. (2018). Influence of network-based structural and power diversity on research performance. Scientometrics, 117(1), 579-590, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2879-3
  • Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 746- 761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003
  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level, top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 204-213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.11.002
  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.
  • Ahmed, A., Mastura, A., Ghafar, N. A., Muhammad, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2016). Impact of article page count and number of authors on citations in disability related fields: a systematic review article. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 45(9), 1118.
  • Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 62, 13-30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.05.003
  • Annalingam, A., Damayanthi, H., Jayawardena, R., & Ranasinghe, P. (2014). Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. Springerplus, 3(1), 140, https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-140
  • ntoniou, G. A., Antoniou, S. A., Georgakarakos, E. I., Sfyroeras, G. S., & Georgiadis, G. S. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. Annals of vascular surgery, 29(2), 286-292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.09.017
  • rif, T., Ali, R., & Asger, M. (2012). Scientific co- authorship social networks: A case study of computer science scenario in India. International Journal of Computer Applications, 52(12), https://doi.org/10.5120/8257-1790
  • Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B., & Díaz-Faes, A. A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 135-144, ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001
  • Bornmann, L. (2017). Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 1036-1047, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23728
  • Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the- art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1-67, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961- 012-9281-8
  • Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying research collaboration: A literature review. All Sprouts, 10(3).
  • Cantner, U., & Rake, B. (2014). International research networks in pharmaceuticals: Structure and dynamics. Research Policy, 43(2), 333-348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.016
  • Chuan-yi, W., & Chen, C. (2017). The Effect of Co-authorship Network on ResearchPerformance of Scholars: A Correlation Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing, (31), ACM
  • Eniayejuni, A. (2018). Impact of Scientific Productivity and Trend on Publication Output of Nigerian Authors in Web of Science from 2006 to 2016. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 28(1),
  • Eslami, H., Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2013). Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: the case of biotechnology in Canada. Scientometrics, 97(1), 99-119, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1069-6
  • Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 222-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.005
  • Hoonlor, A., Szymanski, B. K., & Zaki, M. J. (2013). Trends in computer science research. Communications of the ACM, 56(10), 74-83.
  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. [journal article]. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189-202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3
  • Iglič, H., Doreian, P., Kronegger, L., & Ferligoj, A. (2017). With whom do researchers collaborate and why? Scientometrics, 112(1), 153-174.
  • Ivancheva, L. (2008). Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 47-56.
  • Kahn, M. (2018). Co-authorship as a proxy for collaboration: a cautionary tale. Science and Public Policy, 45(1), 117-123, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx052
  • Khan, B., Robbins, C., Rotermund, S. L., Falkenheim, J. C., Burke, A., Boroush, M., et al. (2016). Science & Engineering Indicators 2016. Washington, DC: National Science Board.
  • Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2013). Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980–2010. [journal article]. Scientometrics, 97(3), 491- 517, ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013- 0994-8
  • Kumar, S., & Mohd. Jan, J. (2014). Relationship between authors’ structural position in the collaboration network and research productivity: Case of Indian earth scientists. Program, 48(4), 355-369, https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2013-0002
  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co- authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15, https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776961
  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131, ttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001c). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 98(2), 404-409, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
  • Osareh, F., Khademi, R., Rostami, M. K., & Shirazi, M. S. (2014). Co-authorship network structure analysis of Iranian researchers’ scientific outputs from 1991 to 2013 based on the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 8(2), 263-271, https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2014.1015301
  • Puuska, H.-M., Muhonen, R., & Leino, Y. (2014). International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines. Scientometrics, 98(2), 823-839, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1181-7
  • Sabah, F., Hassan, S.-U., Muazzam, A., Iqbal, S., Soroya, S. H., & Sarwar, R. (2018). Scientific collaboration networks in Pakistan and their impact on institutional research performance: A case study based on Scopus publications. Library hi tech, 37(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2018-0036
  • Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Research Collaboration in Saudi Arabia 1980–2014: Bibliometric Patterns and National Policy to Foster Research Quantity and Quality. Libri, 66,
  • Shrum, W., Genuth, J., Carlson, W. B., Chompalov, I., & Bijker, W. E. (2007). Structures of scientific collaboration. London: MIT Press.
  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2126-z
  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2017). Do types of collaboration change citation? A scientometric analysis of social science publications in South Africa. Scientometrics, 111(1), 379-400, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2265-6
  • The World Bank (2019). "World Bank Country and Lending Groups." https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.
  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Asif, M., Mahmood, K., & Arshad, A. (2022). Collaboration Trend and its Impact on the Research Productivity in Computer Science Research. Global Social Sciences Review, VII(III), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-III).02

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Asif, Muhammad, Khalid Mahmood, and Alia Arshad. 2022. "Collaboration Trend and its Impact on the Research Productivity in Computer Science Research." Global Social Sciences Review, VII (III): 10-21 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-III).02

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ASIF, M., MAHMOOD, K. & ARSHAD, A. 2022. Collaboration Trend and its Impact on the Research Productivity in Computer Science Research. Global Social Sciences Review, VII, 10-21.

MHRA

    MHRA : Asif, Muhammad, Khalid Mahmood, and Alia Arshad. 2022. "Collaboration Trend and its Impact on the Research Productivity in Computer Science Research." Global Social Sciences Review, VII: 10-21

MLA

    MLA : Asif, Muhammad, Khalid Mahmood, and Alia Arshad. "Collaboration Trend and its Impact on the Research Productivity in Computer Science Research." Global Social Sciences Review, VII.III (2022): 10-21 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Asif, Muhammad, Mahmood, Khalid, and Arshad, Alia (2022), "Collaboration Trend and its Impact on the Research Productivity in Computer Science Research", Global Social Sciences Review, VII (III), 10-21

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Asif, Muhammad, Khalid Mahmood, and Alia Arshad. "Collaboration Trend and its Impact on the Research Productivity in Computer Science Research." Global Social Sciences Review VII, no. III (2022): 10-21. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-III).02