BALANCING AND REBALANCING OF JUDICIAL AUTONOMY A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIC STRUCTURE THEORY

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).16      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).16      Published : Dec 4
Authored by : Bakht Munir , UmeNoreen

16 Pages : 152-159

References

  • Al-Jehad Trust v Federation of Pakistan, [1996] SC 48 PLD 324
  • Almeida, C. (2010, October 22). Breathing Room. Dawn.
  • Bast, J. (2011). Democracy and Constitutionalism in India. A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine.
  • Constitution (19th Amendment) Act, 2010, No. 1 of 2011.
  • Ferejohn, J. A., & Kramer, L. D. (2002). Independent judges, dependent judiciary: Institutionalizing judicial restraint. NYuL REv., 77, 962.
  • Gandhi v Narain, [1973] SC 2299 AIR
  • Haseeb, B., & Imran, M. (2017, November 24). Contempt of Court Notice Issued to Ihsan Iqbal for Inaction over Faizabad Sit-in. Dawn.
  • I.C. Golaknath and Others v State of Punjab [1967] SCR 762 AIR 1643
  • Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry v President of Pakistan, [2010] SC 62 PLD 61, 173. .
  • Iqbal, N. (2010, July 28). Parliament Not Under Trial. Dawn.
  • Kalhan, A. (2013). Gray Zone Constitutionalism and the Dilemma of Judicial Independence in Pakistan. Vand. J. Transnat'l L., 46, 1.
  • Katzmann, R. A. (2010). Courts and congress. Brookings Institution Press
  • Kausar, T. (2013). Judicialization of politics and governance in Pakistan: constitutional and political challenges and the role of the Chaudhry Court. In Pakistan's Stability Paradox (pp. 46-63). Routledge
  • Kennedy, C. H. (2012). The judicialization of politics in Pakistan. The Judicialization of Politics in Asia, 12, 139.
  • Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala [1973] 4 SCC
  • Khan, H. (2005). Constitutional and political history of Pakistan. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Khan, M. (2010, September 19). Towards a New Hegemony. Friday Times.
  • Khan, S. (2010, July 29) 18th Amendment Destroyed CJs Institution: Ramday, News International.
  • Khan, S. (2010, June 11). Parliament Should Have Debated 18th Amendment: CJ. News International.
  • Krishnaswamy, S. (2010). Democracy and constitutionalism in India: a study of the basic structure doctrine. Oxford University Press.
  • Mehta, P. B. (2002). The inner conflict of constitutionalism: Judicial review and the basic structure. India's living constitution: Ideas, practices, controversies, 179.
  • Memogate Case: Kayani, Pasha Relies were Illegal, Implies PM. (2012, January 10). Express Tribune.
  • Minerva Mills Ltd. v India, [1980] SC AIR
  • Mubashir Hussain v Federation of Pakistan, [2010] SC 62 PLD 265, 359-71.
  • Muhammad Khan Achakzai v Federation of Pakistan, [1998] SC 49 PLD 426.
  • Munir Hussain Bhatti v Federation of Pakistan, [2011] SC 407 PLD.
  • Nadeem Ahmad v Federation of Pakistan, [2010] SC 1165 PLD
  • Naqvi, F. H. (2010). Not a new debate. Dawn.(April 23, 2010).
  • Pakistan Lawyers Forum v Federation of Pakistan, [2005] SC 57 PLD 763.
  • Political Parties Order, 2002.
  • Ramachandran, R. (2000). The supreme court and the basic structure doctrine. Supreme but not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of, 1(2), 3.
  • Representation of the Public Act, 1976
  • Shankar, S. (2009). Scaling Justice: India's Supreme Court, Social Rights, and Civil Liberties. OUP Catalogue.
  • Siddique v Federation of Pakistan, [2012] SC 106 PLD
  • Siddique, O. (2010, September 19). Wasteland of Discourse. Friday Times.
  • Siddique, O. (2013). Pakistan's experience with formal law: an alien justice. Cambridge university press.
  • Sindh High Court Bar Association v Federation of Pakistan, [2009] SC 61 PLD.
  • Text of Agreement Signed with Protesters. (2017, November 27). The News.
  • The Constitution of India, 1950.
  • The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973
  • Wukala Mahaz Barai Tahafaz Dastoor v Federation of Pakistan, [1998] SC 50 PLD 1263.

References

  • Al-Jehad Trust v Federation of Pakistan, [1996] SC 48 PLD 324
  • Almeida, C. (2010, October 22). Breathing Room. Dawn.
  • Bast, J. (2011). Democracy and Constitutionalism in India. A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine.
  • Constitution (19th Amendment) Act, 2010, No. 1 of 2011.
  • Ferejohn, J. A., & Kramer, L. D. (2002). Independent judges, dependent judiciary: Institutionalizing judicial restraint. NYuL REv., 77, 962.
  • Gandhi v Narain, [1973] SC 2299 AIR
  • Haseeb, B., & Imran, M. (2017, November 24). Contempt of Court Notice Issued to Ihsan Iqbal for Inaction over Faizabad Sit-in. Dawn.
  • I.C. Golaknath and Others v State of Punjab [1967] SCR 762 AIR 1643
  • Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry v President of Pakistan, [2010] SC 62 PLD 61, 173. .
  • Iqbal, N. (2010, July 28). Parliament Not Under Trial. Dawn.
  • Kalhan, A. (2013). Gray Zone Constitutionalism and the Dilemma of Judicial Independence in Pakistan. Vand. J. Transnat'l L., 46, 1.
  • Katzmann, R. A. (2010). Courts and congress. Brookings Institution Press
  • Kausar, T. (2013). Judicialization of politics and governance in Pakistan: constitutional and political challenges and the role of the Chaudhry Court. In Pakistan's Stability Paradox (pp. 46-63). Routledge
  • Kennedy, C. H. (2012). The judicialization of politics in Pakistan. The Judicialization of Politics in Asia, 12, 139.
  • Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala [1973] 4 SCC
  • Khan, H. (2005). Constitutional and political history of Pakistan. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Khan, M. (2010, September 19). Towards a New Hegemony. Friday Times.
  • Khan, S. (2010, July 29) 18th Amendment Destroyed CJs Institution: Ramday, News International.
  • Khan, S. (2010, June 11). Parliament Should Have Debated 18th Amendment: CJ. News International.
  • Krishnaswamy, S. (2010). Democracy and constitutionalism in India: a study of the basic structure doctrine. Oxford University Press.
  • Mehta, P. B. (2002). The inner conflict of constitutionalism: Judicial review and the basic structure. India's living constitution: Ideas, practices, controversies, 179.
  • Memogate Case: Kayani, Pasha Relies were Illegal, Implies PM. (2012, January 10). Express Tribune.
  • Minerva Mills Ltd. v India, [1980] SC AIR
  • Mubashir Hussain v Federation of Pakistan, [2010] SC 62 PLD 265, 359-71.
  • Muhammad Khan Achakzai v Federation of Pakistan, [1998] SC 49 PLD 426.
  • Munir Hussain Bhatti v Federation of Pakistan, [2011] SC 407 PLD.
  • Nadeem Ahmad v Federation of Pakistan, [2010] SC 1165 PLD
  • Naqvi, F. H. (2010). Not a new debate. Dawn.(April 23, 2010).
  • Pakistan Lawyers Forum v Federation of Pakistan, [2005] SC 57 PLD 763.
  • Political Parties Order, 2002.
  • Ramachandran, R. (2000). The supreme court and the basic structure doctrine. Supreme but not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of, 1(2), 3.
  • Representation of the Public Act, 1976
  • Shankar, S. (2009). Scaling Justice: India's Supreme Court, Social Rights, and Civil Liberties. OUP Catalogue.
  • Siddique v Federation of Pakistan, [2012] SC 106 PLD
  • Siddique, O. (2010, September 19). Wasteland of Discourse. Friday Times.
  • Siddique, O. (2013). Pakistan's experience with formal law: an alien justice. Cambridge university press.
  • Sindh High Court Bar Association v Federation of Pakistan, [2009] SC 61 PLD.
  • Text of Agreement Signed with Protesters. (2017, November 27). The News.
  • The Constitution of India, 1950.
  • The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973
  • Wukala Mahaz Barai Tahafaz Dastoor v Federation of Pakistan, [1998] SC 50 PLD 1263.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Munir, B., & Noreen, U. e. (2020). Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory. Global Social Sciences Review, V(IV), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).16

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Munir, Bakht, and Um e Noreen. 2020. "Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory." Global Social Sciences Review, V (IV): 152-159 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).16

HARVARD

    HARVARD : MUNIR, B. & NOREEN, U. E. 2020. Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 152-159.

MHRA

    MHRA : Munir, Bakht, and Um e Noreen. 2020. "Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 152-159

MLA

    MLA : Munir, Bakht, and Um e Noreen. "Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory." Global Social Sciences Review, V.IV (2020): 152-159 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Munir, Bakht and Noreen, Um e (2020), "Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory", Global Social Sciences Review, V (IV), 152-159

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Munir, Bakht, and Um e Noreen. "Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. IV (2020): 152-159. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).16