A CORPUSBASED COMPARATIVE STYLOMETRY OF BOTH SEXES IN PAKISTANI EDITORIALS AMIDST STANCE MARKERS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-IV).11      10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-IV).11      Published : Dec 4
Authored by : Sikandar Ali khan , Owais Ahmad , Zawar Hussain

11 Pages : 113-123

References

  • Ahmed, F., Shafi, S., & Masood, M. H. (2021, June). Critical Media Discourse Analysis of Honour/Honor Killings in Pakistan. Academia Letters, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.20935/al1242
  • Al-Rikabi, A. K. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of stance and engagement markers in English and Arabic newspaper opinion articles in 2016. Journal of University of Babylon for Humanities, 28(4), 182-194.
  • Alyousef, H. S., & Alotaibi, N. E. (2019). Self- mention markers and their rhetorical functions in dentistry research articles: A corpus-based study of Intradisciplinary variations within seven dentistry Subdisciplines. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 136. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.5p.1 36
  • Anthony, L. (2002). AntConc. Laurence Anthony's. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software /antconc/
  • Aull, L. (2019). Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in Upper-Level Student Writing. Written Communication, 36(1), 1-36.
  • Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (2009). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853880954468 9
  • Blagojević, S. (2009). Expressing attitudes in academic research articles written by English and Serbian authors. Central and Eastern European Online Library, 38(1), 63-73. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article- detail?id=215379
  • Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jiang, F. K. (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001
  • De Bruyn, P. S. (2012). Pragmatic markers: The neglected part of speech. South African Journal of Linguistics, 16(4), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10118063.1998.972 4149
  • Fatima, K., Ahmed, A., & Shafi, S. (2021, September 10). Marxism in Zakia Mashhadi's Death of an Insect. Global Social Sciences Review, 6(3), 28-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI- III).04
  • Fatima, K., Rahim, M. Y., & Musaddiq, K. (2021, September). Marginalization in Hussain's The Desolate City: A Postcolonial Critique. Global Language Review, 6(3), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(vi-iii).03
  • Gut, U., & Unuabonah, F. O. (2019). The use of stance markers in west African Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes, 206- 229. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.88.10gut
  • Hassan, M., Shafi, S. C., & Masood, M. H. (2021, June 30). Literary discourse study: A critical media analysis amidst gender roles and society in Pakistan. International Journal of Pukhtunkhwa (Pukhtunkhwa Journal), 6(1), 64-84. https://pukhtunkhwajournal.org/journals/20 21/64-84.pdf
  • Hussain, Z., Arif, I. M., & Saleem, N. (2021). Thematic discourse analysis of gender objectification in billboard advertisements of Pakistan. Global Language Review, 6(1), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(vi-i).24
  • Hassani, M. T., & Farahani, M. D. (2014). A Discourse Analysis of Gender Differences in the Use of Hedging Devices in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 59-73. https://www.academia.edu/39815588/A_Di scourse_Analysis_of_Gender_Differences_ in_the_Use_of_Hedging_Devices_in_Appli ed_Linguistics_Research_Articles_60_A_Dscourse_Analysis_of_Gender_Differences_ in_the_Use
  • Haufiku, N. K., & Kangira, J. (2017). An exploration of hedging and boosting devices used in academic discourse focusing on English theses at the University of Namibia. Studies in English Language Teaching, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v6n1p1
  • Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378- 2166(02)00035-8
  • Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. file:///C:/Users/Umair Jalal/Downloads/S tance_and_engagement_a_model_of_inter ac.pdf
  • Ivanič, R. (1994). I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898- 5898(94)90018-3
  • Martin, J. R. (2001). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford University Press, UK.
  • Masood, M. H., & Shafi, S. (2020, May 31). Exploring Marxist Perspective Amidst Exploitation and False Consciousness in Hosain's The Old Man. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(3), 18-24.
  • Masood, M. H., Shafi, S., Rahim, M. Y., & Darwesh, M. A. (2020, September 30). Interference of L1 (Urdu) in L2 (English) in Pakistan: Teaching English as a Second Language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(5), 110-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.5p .110
  • Masood, M. H., Shafi, S., & Darwesh, M. A. (2020, February 12). Study of Shakespearean themes and characters through corpus based Voyant Tools approach [Conference session]. National Conference on Education (NCE-2020) 57.
  • Masood, M. H., Shafi, S., Sultana, R., & Firdous, M. (2021, May 16). Transformation Towards Emerging Online Teaching Methodologies from Traditional Classrooms During Covid- 19 Pandemic in Pakistan [Conference session]. First All Pakistan Online Education Summit (APOES 2020) (p. 33), University of Management & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853080207371 2
  • Oxford Languages. (2020, May 20). Oxford languages and Google - English | Oxford languages. Oxford Languages | The Home of Language Data. https://languages.oup.com/google- dictionary-en/
  • Roohi, T., Masood, M. H., & Mushtaq, R. (2021, September). An Analysis of Equity in Secondary School Education: A Headteachers' Perspective. Global Educational Studies Review, 6(3), 29-40.
  • Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2008). The handbook of discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Shafi, S. (2019). Portrayal of two emotions in TV Corpus: A corpus based study. In 5th International Multidisciplinary Research Conference (IMRC) (p. 24). Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Shen, Q., & Tao, Y. (2021). Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0247981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.02479 81
  • Siddiq, M., Arif, I. M. Q., Shafi, S. C., & Masood, M. H. (2021, June). A survey research analysis of effectiveness of vocabulary learning through English vocabulary corpus. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(2), 1-13
  • Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ullah, Z., Arif, I. M. Q., & Qaisar, R. (2020, February 12). Comparative analysis of productivity apps on time management: A survey-based study [Conference session]. National Conference on Education (NCE- 2020) (p. 49), National University of Modern Languages (NUML), H-9 Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Ahmed, F., Shafi, S., & Masood, M. H. (2021, June). Critical Media Discourse Analysis of Honour/Honor Killings in Pakistan. Academia Letters, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.20935/al1242
  • Al-Rikabi, A. K. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of stance and engagement markers in English and Arabic newspaper opinion articles in 2016. Journal of University of Babylon for Humanities, 28(4), 182-194.
  • Alyousef, H. S., & Alotaibi, N. E. (2019). Self- mention markers and their rhetorical functions in dentistry research articles: A corpus-based study of Intradisciplinary variations within seven dentistry Subdisciplines. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 136. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.5p.1 36
  • Anthony, L. (2002). AntConc. Laurence Anthony's. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software /antconc/
  • Aull, L. (2019). Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in Upper-Level Student Writing. Written Communication, 36(1), 1-36.
  • Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (2009). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853880954468 9
  • Blagojević, S. (2009). Expressing attitudes in academic research articles written by English and Serbian authors. Central and Eastern European Online Library, 38(1), 63-73. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article- detail?id=215379
  • Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jiang, F. K. (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001
  • De Bruyn, P. S. (2012). Pragmatic markers: The neglected part of speech. South African Journal of Linguistics, 16(4), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10118063.1998.972 4149
  • Fatima, K., Ahmed, A., & Shafi, S. (2021, September 10). Marxism in Zakia Mashhadi's Death of an Insect. Global Social Sciences Review, 6(3), 28-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI- III).04
  • Fatima, K., Rahim, M. Y., & Musaddiq, K. (2021, September). Marginalization in Hussain's The Desolate City: A Postcolonial Critique. Global Language Review, 6(3), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(vi-iii).03
  • Gut, U., & Unuabonah, F. O. (2019). The use of stance markers in west African Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes, 206- 229. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.88.10gut
  • Hassan, M., Shafi, S. C., & Masood, M. H. (2021, June 30). Literary discourse study: A critical media analysis amidst gender roles and society in Pakistan. International Journal of Pukhtunkhwa (Pukhtunkhwa Journal), 6(1), 64-84. https://pukhtunkhwajournal.org/journals/20 21/64-84.pdf
  • Hussain, Z., Arif, I. M., & Saleem, N. (2021). Thematic discourse analysis of gender objectification in billboard advertisements of Pakistan. Global Language Review, 6(1), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(vi-i).24
  • Hassani, M. T., & Farahani, M. D. (2014). A Discourse Analysis of Gender Differences in the Use of Hedging Devices in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 59-73. https://www.academia.edu/39815588/A_Di scourse_Analysis_of_Gender_Differences_ in_the_Use_of_Hedging_Devices_in_Appli ed_Linguistics_Research_Articles_60_A_Dscourse_Analysis_of_Gender_Differences_ in_the_Use
  • Haufiku, N. K., & Kangira, J. (2017). An exploration of hedging and boosting devices used in academic discourse focusing on English theses at the University of Namibia. Studies in English Language Teaching, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v6n1p1
  • Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378- 2166(02)00035-8
  • Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. file:///C:/Users/Umair Jalal/Downloads/S tance_and_engagement_a_model_of_inter ac.pdf
  • Ivanič, R. (1994). I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898- 5898(94)90018-3
  • Martin, J. R. (2001). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford University Press, UK.
  • Masood, M. H., & Shafi, S. (2020, May 31). Exploring Marxist Perspective Amidst Exploitation and False Consciousness in Hosain's The Old Man. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(3), 18-24.
  • Masood, M. H., Shafi, S., Rahim, M. Y., & Darwesh, M. A. (2020, September 30). Interference of L1 (Urdu) in L2 (English) in Pakistan: Teaching English as a Second Language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(5), 110-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.5p .110
  • Masood, M. H., Shafi, S., & Darwesh, M. A. (2020, February 12). Study of Shakespearean themes and characters through corpus based Voyant Tools approach [Conference session]. National Conference on Education (NCE-2020) 57.
  • Masood, M. H., Shafi, S., Sultana, R., & Firdous, M. (2021, May 16). Transformation Towards Emerging Online Teaching Methodologies from Traditional Classrooms During Covid- 19 Pandemic in Pakistan [Conference session]. First All Pakistan Online Education Summit (APOES 2020) (p. 33), University of Management & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853080207371 2
  • Oxford Languages. (2020, May 20). Oxford languages and Google - English | Oxford languages. Oxford Languages | The Home of Language Data. https://languages.oup.com/google- dictionary-en/
  • Roohi, T., Masood, M. H., & Mushtaq, R. (2021, September). An Analysis of Equity in Secondary School Education: A Headteachers' Perspective. Global Educational Studies Review, 6(3), 29-40.
  • Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2008). The handbook of discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Shafi, S. (2019). Portrayal of two emotions in TV Corpus: A corpus based study. In 5th International Multidisciplinary Research Conference (IMRC) (p. 24). Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Shen, Q., & Tao, Y. (2021). Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0247981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.02479 81
  • Siddiq, M., Arif, I. M. Q., Shafi, S. C., & Masood, M. H. (2021, June). A survey research analysis of effectiveness of vocabulary learning through English vocabulary corpus. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(2), 1-13
  • Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ullah, Z., Arif, I. M. Q., & Qaisar, R. (2020, February 12). Comparative analysis of productivity apps on time management: A survey-based study [Conference session]. National Conference on Education (NCE- 2020) (p. 49), National University of Modern Languages (NUML), H-9 Islamabad, Pakistan.

Cite this article

    APA : khan, S. A., Ahmad, O., & Hussain, Z. (2021). A Corpus-Based Comparative Stylometry of Both Sexes in Pakistani Editorials Amidst Stance Markers. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(IV), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-IV).11
    CHICAGO : khan, Sikandar Ali, Owais Ahmad, and Zawar Hussain. 2021. "A Corpus-Based Comparative Stylometry of Both Sexes in Pakistani Editorials Amidst Stance Markers." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (IV): 113-123 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-IV).11
    HARVARD : KHAN, S. A., AHMAD, O. & HUSSAIN, Z. 2021. A Corpus-Based Comparative Stylometry of Both Sexes in Pakistani Editorials Amidst Stance Markers. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 113-123.
    MHRA : khan, Sikandar Ali, Owais Ahmad, and Zawar Hussain. 2021. "A Corpus-Based Comparative Stylometry of Both Sexes in Pakistani Editorials Amidst Stance Markers." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 113-123
    MLA : khan, Sikandar Ali, Owais Ahmad, and Zawar Hussain. "A Corpus-Based Comparative Stylometry of Both Sexes in Pakistani Editorials Amidst Stance Markers." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.IV (2021): 113-123 Print.
    OXFORD : khan, Sikandar Ali, Ahmad, Owais, and Hussain, Zawar (2021), "A Corpus-Based Comparative Stylometry of Both Sexes in Pakistani Editorials Amidst Stance Markers", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (IV), 113-123
    TURABIAN : khan, Sikandar Ali, Owais Ahmad, and Zawar Hussain. "A Corpus-Based Comparative Stylometry of Both Sexes in Pakistani Editorials Amidst Stance Markers." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. IV (2021): 113-123. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-IV).11