A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FLIPPEDLEARNING AND ELEARNING IN ELT TEACHER EDUCATION

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).55      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).55      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : Ejaz Mirza , Muhammad Haseeb Nasir

55 Pages : 430-437

References

  • Aparicio, M. (2013). E-learning concept trends. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (pp. 81-86). New York.
  • Balaji, A. (2018). Flipping the Classroom in ELT Context. International Journal of Science Research and Review, 7(1), 75-77.
  • Bax, S. (2003). CALL- past, present and future. iateflcompsig (pp. 13-28). Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • Karaaslan, H. (2017). ELT teacher education flipped classroom: An analysis of task challenge and student teachers‟ views and expectations. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 643-666.
  • Kashada, A. (2014). Adoptation of flipped classroom at K-12 education in developing countries: Challenges and obstacles. Internatikonal Journal of Emerging Technologires in Learning,12(10), 147-157.
  • Kop, R. (2011). The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19-38.
  • Li, F. (2014). Traditional Classroom VS E-learning in Higher education. iJet, 9(2), 48-51. Network, F. L. (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P. 2019,
  • Aparicio, M. (2013). E-learning concept trends. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (pp. 81-86). New York.
  • Balaji, A. (2018). Flipping the Classroom in ELT Context. International Journal of Science Research and Review, 7(1), 75-77.
  • Bax, S. (2003). CALL- past, present and future. iateflcompsig (pp. 13-28). Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • Karaaslan, H. (2017). ELT teacher education flipped classroom: An analysis of task challenge and student teachers‟ views and expectations. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 643-666.
  • Kashada, A. (2014). Adoptation of flipped classroom at K-12 education in developing countries: Challenges and obstacles. Internatikonal Journal of Emerging Technologires in Learning,12(10), 147-157.
  • Kop, R. (2011). The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19-38.
  • Li, F. (2014). Traditional Classroom VS E-learning in Higher education. iJet, 9(2), 48-51. Network, F. L. (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P. 2019,

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Mirza, Ejaz, and Muhammad Haseeb Nasir. 2019. "A Comparative Study of Flipped-Learning and E-Learning in ELT Teacher Education." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II): 430-437 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).55
    HARVARD : MIRZA, E. & NASIR, M. H. 2019. A Comparative Study of Flipped-Learning and E-Learning in ELT Teacher Education. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 430-437.
    MHRA : Mirza, Ejaz, and Muhammad Haseeb Nasir. 2019. "A Comparative Study of Flipped-Learning and E-Learning in ELT Teacher Education." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 430-437
    MLA : Mirza, Ejaz, and Muhammad Haseeb Nasir. "A Comparative Study of Flipped-Learning and E-Learning in ELT Teacher Education." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.II (2019): 430-437 Print.
    OXFORD : Mirza, Ejaz and Nasir, Muhammad Haseeb (2019), "A Comparative Study of Flipped-Learning and E-Learning in ELT Teacher Education", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II), 430-437
    TURABIAN : Mirza, Ejaz, and Muhammad Haseeb Nasir. "A Comparative Study of Flipped-Learning and E-Learning in ELT Teacher Education." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. II (2019): 430-437. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).55