References

• Babrakzai, F. (1999). Topics in Pashto syntax. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Honolulu, HawaiÊ»i, USA.
• Benineca, P. & Poletto, C. (2004). Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In L. Rizzi (Ed.) The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Belloro, V. A. (2007). Spanish clitic doubling: A study of the syntax-pragmatics interface. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) State University of New York at Buffalo: Buffalo.
• Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Blackwell.
• Crasborn, O., Van Der K., E., Ros, J., & De Hoop, H. (2009). Topic agreement in NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands). The Linguistic Review, 26(2-3), 355-370.
• De Swart, H. and Helen, D. (2000). Topic and focus. In L. Cheng, & R. Sybesma, (Eds.), The first glot international state-of-the-article book (pp. 105-130). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Dryer, M. S. (2008). Order of Subjects, Objects and Verbs. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (301-344). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.
• Farrell, P. (2005). Grammatical relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Farkas, D. & Henriëtte, D. (2006). Article choice in plural generics. Lingua 117, 1657-1676.
• Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. Perspectives in neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.
• Givón, T. (1988). The pragmatics of word-order: Predictability, importance, attention. In M. Hammond, E., Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology. (pp. 243-284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Ltd.
• Greenberg, J. H., & O'Sullivan, C. (1974). Frequency, marking, and discourse styles with special reference to substantival categories in the Romance languages. Working Papers on Language Universals, 16, 47-72.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Haiman, J (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781-819.
• Holton I., E. F., Bates, R. A., Seyler, D. L., & Carvalho, M. B. (1997). Final word: Reply to Newstrom's and Tang's reactions. Human resource development quarterly, 8(2), 95-145.
• Jaeggli, O. A. (1986). Passive. Linguistic inquiry, 17(4), 587-622.
• Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Levin, B. and Malka, R. H. (2005). Argument realization, research surveys in linguistics series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Rahman, G, (2014). Verbal Clitics in Pashto. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Azad Jammu and Kashmir University: Muzaffarbabad, Pakistan.
• Rahman, G. & Bukhari, N. H. (2014). Case System in Pashto: Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 17(1), 173-193.
• Rahman, G, Riaz, D. & Iqbal, M. (2017). Cognitive Accessibility and Referents Encoding Possibilities. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 20(2), 37-50.
• Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Eds.). Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Roberts, T. (2000). Clitics and Agreement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Massachusetts, USA.
• Skopeteas, S. and Elisabeth V. (2009). The interaction between topicalization and structural constraints: evidence from Yucatec Maya. The Linguistic Review, 26(2), 173-176.
• Tegey, H. and Robson, B. (1996). A Reference Grammar of Pashto. Washington, DC. Office of International Education (ED).
• Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.
• Trijp, V. R. (2017). The Evolution of Case Grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.
• Vallduví, E. (1990). The informational component. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
• Vogels, J. (2009). Subject first or topic first: A corpus study of the position of bare and definite plural subjects in Dutch. (Unpublished Master's thesis). Radboud University: Nijmegen.
• Weissenrieder, M. (1995). Indirect object doubling: saying things twice in Spanish. Hispania, 78(1), 169-177.