References
- Babrakzai, F. (1999). Topics in Pashto syntax. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, USA.
- Benineca, P. & Poletto, C. (2004). Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In L. Rizzi (Ed.) The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Belloro, V. A. (2007). Spanish clitic doubling: A study of the syntax-pragmatics interface. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) State University of New York at Buffalo: Buffalo.
- Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Blackwell.
- Crasborn, O., Van Der K., E., Ros, J., & De Hoop, H. (2009). Topic agreement in NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands). The Linguistic Review, 26(2-3), 355-370.
- De Swart, H. and Helen, D. (2000). Topic and focus. In L. Cheng, & R. Sybesma, (Eds.), The first glot international state-of-the-article book (pp. 105-130). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Dryer, M. S. (2008). Order of Subjects, Objects and Verbs. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (301-344). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.
- Farrell, P. (2005). Grammatical relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Farkas, D. & Henriëtte, D. (2006). Article choice in plural generics. Lingua 117, 1657-1676.
- Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. Perspectives in neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.
- Givón, T. (1988). The pragmatics of word-order: Predictability, importance, attention. In M. Hammond, E., Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology. (pp. 243-284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Ltd.
- Greenberg, J. H., & O'Sullivan, C. (1974). Frequency, marking, and discourse styles with special reference to substantival categories in the Romance languages. Working Papers on Language Universals, 16, 47-72.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Haiman, J (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781-819.
- Holton I., E. F., Bates, R. A., Seyler, D. L., & Carvalho, M. B. (1997). Final word: Reply to Newstrom's and Tang's reactions. Human resource development quarterly, 8(2), 95-145.
- Jaeggli, O. A. (1986). Passive. Linguistic inquiry, 17(4), 587-622.
- Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Levin, B. and Malka, R. H. (2005). Argument realization, research surveys in linguistics series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Rahman, G, (2014). Verbal Clitics in Pashto. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Azad Jammu and Kashmir University: Muzaffarbabad, Pakistan.
- Rahman, G. & Bukhari, N. H. (2014). Case System in Pashto: Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 17(1), 173-193.
- Rahman, G, Riaz, D. & Iqbal, M. (2017). Cognitive Accessibility and Referents Encoding Possibilities. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 20(2), 37-50.
- Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Eds.). Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Roberts, T. (2000). Clitics and Agreement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Massachusetts, USA.
- Skopeteas, S. and Elisabeth V. (2009). The interaction between topicalization and structural constraints: evidence from Yucatec Maya. The Linguistic Review, 26(2), 173-176.
- Tegey, H. and Robson, B. (1996). A Reference Grammar of Pashto. Washington, DC. Office of International Education (ED).
- Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.
- Trijp, V. R. (2017). The Evolution of Case Grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.
- VallduvÃ, E. (1990). The informational component. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
- Vogels, J. (2009). Subject first or topic first: A corpus study of the position of bare and definite plural subjects in Dutch. (Unpublished Master's thesis). Radboud University: Nijmegen.
- Weissenrieder, M. (1995). Indirect object doubling: saying things twice in Spanish. Hispania, 78(1), 169-177.
- Babrakzai, F. (1999). Topics in Pashto syntax. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, USA.
- Benineca, P. & Poletto, C. (2004). Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In L. Rizzi (Ed.) The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Belloro, V. A. (2007). Spanish clitic doubling: A study of the syntax-pragmatics interface. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) State University of New York at Buffalo: Buffalo.
- Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Blackwell.
- Crasborn, O., Van Der K., E., Ros, J., & De Hoop, H. (2009). Topic agreement in NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands). The Linguistic Review, 26(2-3), 355-370.
- De Swart, H. and Helen, D. (2000). Topic and focus. In L. Cheng, & R. Sybesma, (Eds.), The first glot international state-of-the-article book (pp. 105-130). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Dryer, M. S. (2008). Order of Subjects, Objects and Verbs. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (301-344). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.
- Farrell, P. (2005). Grammatical relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Farkas, D. & Henriëtte, D. (2006). Article choice in plural generics. Lingua 117, 1657-1676.
- Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. Perspectives in neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.
- Givón, T. (1988). The pragmatics of word-order: Predictability, importance, attention. In M. Hammond, E., Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology. (pp. 243-284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Ltd.
- Greenberg, J. H., & O'Sullivan, C. (1974). Frequency, marking, and discourse styles with special reference to substantival categories in the Romance languages. Working Papers on Language Universals, 16, 47-72.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Haiman, J (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781-819.
- Holton I., E. F., Bates, R. A., Seyler, D. L., & Carvalho, M. B. (1997). Final word: Reply to Newstrom's and Tang's reactions. Human resource development quarterly, 8(2), 95-145.
- Jaeggli, O. A. (1986). Passive. Linguistic inquiry, 17(4), 587-622.
- Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Levin, B. and Malka, R. H. (2005). Argument realization, research surveys in linguistics series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Rahman, G, (2014). Verbal Clitics in Pashto. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Azad Jammu and Kashmir University: Muzaffarbabad, Pakistan.
- Rahman, G. & Bukhari, N. H. (2014). Case System in Pashto: Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 17(1), 173-193.
- Rahman, G, Riaz, D. & Iqbal, M. (2017). Cognitive Accessibility and Referents Encoding Possibilities. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 20(2), 37-50.
- Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Eds.). Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Roberts, T. (2000). Clitics and Agreement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Massachusetts, USA.
- Skopeteas, S. and Elisabeth V. (2009). The interaction between topicalization and structural constraints: evidence from Yucatec Maya. The Linguistic Review, 26(2), 173-176.
- Tegey, H. and Robson, B. (1996). A Reference Grammar of Pashto. Washington, DC. Office of International Education (ED).
- Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.
- Trijp, V. R. (2017). The Evolution of Case Grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.
- VallduvÃ, E. (1990). The informational component. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
- Vogels, J. (2009). Subject first or topic first: A corpus study of the position of bare and definite plural subjects in Dutch. (Unpublished Master's thesis). Radboud University: Nijmegen.
- Weissenrieder, M. (1995). Indirect object doubling: saying things twice in Spanish. Hispania, 78(1), 169-177.
Cite this article
-
APA : Rahman, G., Anees, M., & Khan, A. A. (2020). Topicalization in Pashto. Global Social Sciences Review, V(I), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).17
-
CHICAGO : Rahman, Ghani, Muhammad Anees, and Arshad Ali Khan. 2020. "Topicalization in Pashto." Global Social Sciences Review, V (I): 163-171 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).17
-
HARVARD : RAHMAN, G., ANEES, M. & KHAN, A. A. 2020. Topicalization in Pashto. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 163-171.
-
MHRA : Rahman, Ghani, Muhammad Anees, and Arshad Ali Khan. 2020. "Topicalization in Pashto." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 163-171
-
MLA : Rahman, Ghani, Muhammad Anees, and Arshad Ali Khan. "Topicalization in Pashto." Global Social Sciences Review, V.I (2020): 163-171 Print.
-
OXFORD : Rahman, Ghani, Anees, Muhammad, and Khan, Arshad Ali (2020), "Topicalization in Pashto", Global Social Sciences Review, V (I), 163-171
-
TURABIAN : Rahman, Ghani, Muhammad Anees, and Arshad Ali Khan. "Topicalization in Pashto." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. I (2020): 163-171. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).17