THE PORTRAYAL OF PIGGYS MIND IN LORD OF THE FLIES IN THE LIGHT OF GHAZALIAN THEORY OF SOUL AND FREUDIAN PSYCHOANALYSIS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).01      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).01      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : ShumailaMazhar , MehwishMalghani , ShabanaAkhtar

01 Pages : 1-7

References

  • Al-Saidi, A. (2012). Savagery and heart of darkness in William Golding's lord of the flies. Studies in Literature and Language. 4 (1), 129-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
  • Attride-Sterling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Babb, H. S. (1970). The Novels of William Golding: Columbus: Ohio State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Brooks, P. (1984). Reading for the plot, designs and intentions in narrative. Clarendon Press Oxford.
  • Bufkin, E. C. (1965). Lord of the flies: An analysis. The Georgia Review, 19(1), 40-57. Published by Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia by and on Behalf of the University of Georgia and the Georgia Review. Bureau of Education, XXIII(3),519-542.
  • Eysenck, M. W. (2013). Perspectives on psychology. Psychology Press. Taylor and Francis Group, New York.
  • Fitzgarald, J. F., & Kayser, J, R. (1992). Golding's lord of the flies: Pride as original sin. Studies in the Novel, 24(1), 78-88.
  • Freud, S. (1933). The new introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., Inc.
  • Gallagher, M. P. (1965). The human image in William Golding. An Irish Quarterly Review, 54, 197-216. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30089009
  • Ghazali, A. H. (1993). Revival of religious learning. Ihya-ulum- Udin Book 3. Fazal-ul-Karim. Trans., Muhammad Ashraf, Lahore.
  • Ghazali, A. H. (1998). Kimyâ-yı saadet kimiya-e saadat-The alchemy of happiness. The Other Press. ISBN 9839154958, 9789839154955.
  • Ghazanfar, S.M. (1993). The economic thought of Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali and St. Thomas Aquinas: Some comparative parallels and links; History of political economy. Duke University Press.
  • Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the Flies. Faber & Faber.
  • Isaoglu H. (2014). A psychoanalytic criticism of Hawthorne's the Scarlet letter and Melville's Moby Dick. Istanbul Ayadin University Graduate Institute of Social Sciences; English Language and Literature. ISBN 0226450155, 9780226450155.
  • Kinkead- Weekes, M., & Gregor, I. (1968). William Golding: A critical study. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Niven, A. (1980). William- Golding: Lord of the flies. Great Britain: Longman Group Ltd.
  • Oldsey, B., & Weintraub, S. (1963). Lord of the flies: Beezlebub revisited. National Council of Teachers of English, 25(2), 90-99. DOI: 10.2307/373397
  • Olsen, K. (2000). Understanding lord of the flies: A student casebook to issues, sources, and historical documents. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Reiff, R. (2009). William Golding: Lord of the flies. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.
  • Schwartz, J. (1999). Cassandra's daughter: A history of psychoanalysis. New York: Viking.
  • Spitz, D. (1970). Power and authority: An interpretation of Golding's lord of the flies. The Antioch Review, 30(1), 21-33. DOI: 10.2307/4637248
  • Smith, M. (1944). Al-Ghazali, the mystic: A study of the life and personality of AbÅ« Hāmid Muhammad Al-TÅ«sÄ« Al-Ghazāl: Luzac & Company. London.
  • Al-Saidi, A. (2012). Savagery and heart of darkness in William Golding's lord of the flies. Studies in Literature and Language. 4 (1), 129-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
  • Attride-Sterling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Babb, H. S. (1970). The Novels of William Golding: Columbus: Ohio State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Brooks, P. (1984). Reading for the plot, designs and intentions in narrative. Clarendon Press Oxford.
  • Bufkin, E. C. (1965). Lord of the flies: An analysis. The Georgia Review, 19(1), 40-57. Published by Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia by and on Behalf of the University of Georgia and the Georgia Review. Bureau of Education, XXIII(3),519-542.
  • Eysenck, M. W. (2013). Perspectives on psychology. Psychology Press. Taylor and Francis Group, New York.
  • Fitzgarald, J. F., & Kayser, J, R. (1992). Golding's lord of the flies: Pride as original sin. Studies in the Novel, 24(1), 78-88.
  • Freud, S. (1933). The new introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., Inc.
  • Gallagher, M. P. (1965). The human image in William Golding. An Irish Quarterly Review, 54, 197-216. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30089009
  • Ghazali, A. H. (1993). Revival of religious learning. Ihya-ulum- Udin Book 3. Fazal-ul-Karim. Trans., Muhammad Ashraf, Lahore.
  • Ghazali, A. H. (1998). Kimyâ-yı saadet kimiya-e saadat-The alchemy of happiness. The Other Press. ISBN 9839154958, 9789839154955.
  • Ghazanfar, S.M. (1993). The economic thought of Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali and St. Thomas Aquinas: Some comparative parallels and links; History of political economy. Duke University Press.
  • Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the Flies. Faber & Faber.
  • Isaoglu H. (2014). A psychoanalytic criticism of Hawthorne's the Scarlet letter and Melville's Moby Dick. Istanbul Ayadin University Graduate Institute of Social Sciences; English Language and Literature. ISBN 0226450155, 9780226450155.
  • Kinkead- Weekes, M., & Gregor, I. (1968). William Golding: A critical study. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Niven, A. (1980). William- Golding: Lord of the flies. Great Britain: Longman Group Ltd.
  • Oldsey, B., & Weintraub, S. (1963). Lord of the flies: Beezlebub revisited. National Council of Teachers of English, 25(2), 90-99. DOI: 10.2307/373397
  • Olsen, K. (2000). Understanding lord of the flies: A student casebook to issues, sources, and historical documents. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Reiff, R. (2009). William Golding: Lord of the flies. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.
  • Schwartz, J. (1999). Cassandra's daughter: A history of psychoanalysis. New York: Viking.
  • Spitz, D. (1970). Power and authority: An interpretation of Golding's lord of the flies. The Antioch Review, 30(1), 21-33. DOI: 10.2307/4637248
  • Smith, M. (1944). Al-Ghazali, the mystic: A study of the life and personality of AbÅ« Hāmid Muhammad Al-TÅ«sÄ« Al-Ghazāl: Luzac & Company. London.

Cite this article

    APA : Mazhar, S., Malghani, M., & Akhtar, S. (2019). The Portrayal of Piggy's Mind in Lord of the Flies in the Light of Ghazalian Theory of Soul and Freudian Psychoanalysis. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(I), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).01
    CHICAGO : Mazhar, Shumaila, Mehwish Malghani, and Shabana Akhtar. 2019. "The Portrayal of Piggy's Mind in Lord of the Flies in the Light of Ghazalian Theory of Soul and Freudian Psychoanalysis." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I): 1-7 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).01
    HARVARD : MAZHAR, S., MALGHANI, M. & AKHTAR, S. 2019. The Portrayal of Piggy's Mind in Lord of the Flies in the Light of Ghazalian Theory of Soul and Freudian Psychoanalysis. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 1-7.
    MHRA : Mazhar, Shumaila, Mehwish Malghani, and Shabana Akhtar. 2019. "The Portrayal of Piggy's Mind in Lord of the Flies in the Light of Ghazalian Theory of Soul and Freudian Psychoanalysis." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 1-7
    MLA : Mazhar, Shumaila, Mehwish Malghani, and Shabana Akhtar. "The Portrayal of Piggy's Mind in Lord of the Flies in the Light of Ghazalian Theory of Soul and Freudian Psychoanalysis." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.I (2019): 1-7 Print.
    OXFORD : Mazhar, Shumaila, Malghani, Mehwish, and Akhtar, Shabana (2019), "The Portrayal of Piggy's Mind in Lord of the Flies in the Light of Ghazalian Theory of Soul and Freudian Psychoanalysis", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I), 1-7
    TURABIAN : Mazhar, Shumaila, Mehwish Malghani, and Shabana Akhtar. "The Portrayal of Piggy's Mind in Lord of the Flies in the Light of Ghazalian Theory of Soul and Freudian Psychoanalysis." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. I (2019): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).01