SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN IN THE AGE OF DIGITAL LITERACY A CASE STUDY OF PAKISTAN ISLAMABAD RAWALPINDI

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).11      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).11      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : SohimaAnzak , AneelaSultana

11 Pages : 102-111

References

  • Aqili, S., & Nasiri, B. (2010). Technology and the need for media literacy education inthe twenty-first century. European Journal of Social Science, 15(3), 449-456.
  • Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in Adaptation and change in electric era. European Psychologist, 7(1), 2-16.
  • Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches 5th ed. United Kingdom: Alta Mira Press.
  • Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2005). Challenging Online Behaviors of Youth: Findings from a Comparative Analysis of Young People in the United States and New Zealand. Social Science Computer Review ,Vol 23, Issue 1, 2005.
  • Boyd, D. (2014). It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. CT,USA: Yale University Press New Haven.
  • Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2008, September). Models and Instruments for AssessingDigital Competence at School. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4(3), 183 - 193.
  • Chase, Z., & Laufenberg, D. (2011). Digital literacies: Embracing the squishiness ofdigital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(7), 535-537.
  • Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-12.
  • Duncan, A. ( 2013, April 23rd tuesday). Education: The Most Powerful Weapon for Changing the World. (USAID, Producer) Retrieved from Impact blog USAID: https://blog.usaid.gov/2013/04/education-the-most-powerful-weapon/
  • Dzisi, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial Activities of Indigenous African Women: A Case of Ghana. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 2(3), 254-264.
  • Erstad, O. (Feb 2012). The learning lives of digital youth-beyound the formal and informal. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 25-43.
  • Forge.S, & Blackman.C. (2008). The role of ICTs in shaping the family of the future', in OECD (ed) The future of the family to 2030. paris: OECD.
  • Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley.
  • Greene, P. B. (2001). Patterns of venture capital funding: is gender a factor? Venture Capital, 3(1), 63- 68.
  • GSMA. (2015). Connected Women, Bridging the gender gap: Mobile accessand usage in low- and middle-income countries, 2015. GSMA.
  • GSMA. (2019). Connected Women. GSMA.
  • Hobbs, R. (2011). Empowering learners with digital and media literacy. . KnowledgeQuest, 39(5), 12- 17.
  • ITU. (2019). The World in 2014: Global ICT Statistics. ITU.
  • Kantor, P. (2002). Female mobility in India - The influence of seclusion norms on economic outcomes. International Development Planning Review , 24(2), 145-159.
  • Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating Constructivism into Instructional Design:Potential and Limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17-27.
  • Kirkwood, J. (2009). Motivational factors in a push-pull theory of entrepreneurship. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 346-364.
  • L.Manovich. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge. Cambridge: MA:MIT.
  • Lister, M. (2009). New media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge .
  • M.Heffernan. (2007). How she does it: how women entrepreneurs are changing the rules of business success. New York: Viking.
  • M.J.Steward. (2005). Expanding theoretical conceptualizations of self-help groups. Social Science Medicine, 31(9), Social Science Medicine.
  • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 405-412.
  • Moore, D. P., & Buttne, E. H. (1997). Women Entrepreneurs: Moving Beyond the Glass Ceiling. Detroit IM,USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Perkins, D. N. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.
  • Picard, N., & Bollinger, K. (2015). In Asia: Notes from the Field: Leveraging Technology to Connect Asia's Women Entrepreneurs. The Asia Foundation.
  • Ribble, M. S. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6-12.
  • Ribble, M. S. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6-12.
  • SheSpeaks, I. (2020, 01 30). . Retrieved from SheSpeaks: http;//www.shespeaks.com https://shespeaksinc.com/
  • Singh, A. P. (2009). Women's Participation at Grassroot Level. Patiala: Punjabi University,.
  • Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1-19.
  • UN. (2015). Sustainable development Goals. UN. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen, & N. (. Postlewaite, International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 162-163). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • World Bank. (2016). World Development Report 2016:Digital Dividends. World Bank.
  • Aqili, S., & Nasiri, B. (2010). Technology and the need for media literacy education inthe twenty-first century. European Journal of Social Science, 15(3), 449-456.
  • Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in Adaptation and change in electric era. European Psychologist, 7(1), 2-16.
  • Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches 5th ed. United Kingdom: Alta Mira Press.
  • Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2005). Challenging Online Behaviors of Youth: Findings from a Comparative Analysis of Young People in the United States and New Zealand. Social Science Computer Review ,Vol 23, Issue 1, 2005.
  • Boyd, D. (2014). It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. CT,USA: Yale University Press New Haven.
  • Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2008, September). Models and Instruments for AssessingDigital Competence at School. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4(3), 183 - 193.
  • Chase, Z., & Laufenberg, D. (2011). Digital literacies: Embracing the squishiness ofdigital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(7), 535-537.
  • Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-12.
  • Duncan, A. ( 2013, April 23rd tuesday). Education: The Most Powerful Weapon for Changing the World. (USAID, Producer) Retrieved from Impact blog USAID: https://blog.usaid.gov/2013/04/education-the-most-powerful-weapon/
  • Dzisi, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial Activities of Indigenous African Women: A Case of Ghana. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 2(3), 254-264.
  • Erstad, O. (Feb 2012). The learning lives of digital youth-beyound the formal and informal. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 25-43.
  • Forge.S, & Blackman.C. (2008). The role of ICTs in shaping the family of the future', in OECD (ed) The future of the family to 2030. paris: OECD.
  • Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley.
  • Greene, P. B. (2001). Patterns of venture capital funding: is gender a factor? Venture Capital, 3(1), 63- 68.
  • GSMA. (2015). Connected Women, Bridging the gender gap: Mobile accessand usage in low- and middle-income countries, 2015. GSMA.
  • GSMA. (2019). Connected Women. GSMA.
  • Hobbs, R. (2011). Empowering learners with digital and media literacy. . KnowledgeQuest, 39(5), 12- 17.
  • ITU. (2019). The World in 2014: Global ICT Statistics. ITU.
  • Kantor, P. (2002). Female mobility in India - The influence of seclusion norms on economic outcomes. International Development Planning Review , 24(2), 145-159.
  • Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating Constructivism into Instructional Design:Potential and Limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17-27.
  • Kirkwood, J. (2009). Motivational factors in a push-pull theory of entrepreneurship. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 346-364.
  • L.Manovich. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge. Cambridge: MA:MIT.
  • Lister, M. (2009). New media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge .
  • M.Heffernan. (2007). How she does it: how women entrepreneurs are changing the rules of business success. New York: Viking.
  • M.J.Steward. (2005). Expanding theoretical conceptualizations of self-help groups. Social Science Medicine, 31(9), Social Science Medicine.
  • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 405-412.
  • Moore, D. P., & Buttne, E. H. (1997). Women Entrepreneurs: Moving Beyond the Glass Ceiling. Detroit IM,USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Perkins, D. N. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.
  • Picard, N., & Bollinger, K. (2015). In Asia: Notes from the Field: Leveraging Technology to Connect Asia's Women Entrepreneurs. The Asia Foundation.
  • Ribble, M. S. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6-12.
  • Ribble, M. S. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6-12.
  • SheSpeaks, I. (2020, 01 30). . Retrieved from SheSpeaks: http;//www.shespeaks.com https://shespeaksinc.com/
  • Singh, A. P. (2009). Women's Participation at Grassroot Level. Patiala: Punjabi University,.
  • Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1-19.
  • UN. (2015). Sustainable development Goals. UN. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen, & N. (. Postlewaite, International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 162-163). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • World Bank. (2016). World Development Report 2016:Digital Dividends. World Bank.

Cite this article

    APA : Anzak, S., & Sultana, A. (2020). Social and Economic Empowerment of Women in the Age of Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Pakistan, Islamabad- Rawalpindi. Global Social Sciences Review, V(I), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).11
    CHICAGO : Anzak, Sohima, and Aneela Sultana. 2020. "Social and Economic Empowerment of Women in the Age of Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Pakistan, Islamabad- Rawalpindi." Global Social Sciences Review, V (I): 102-111 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).11
    HARVARD : ANZAK, S. & SULTANA, A. 2020. Social and Economic Empowerment of Women in the Age of Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Pakistan, Islamabad- Rawalpindi. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 102-111.
    MHRA : Anzak, Sohima, and Aneela Sultana. 2020. "Social and Economic Empowerment of Women in the Age of Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Pakistan, Islamabad- Rawalpindi." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 102-111
    MLA : Anzak, Sohima, and Aneela Sultana. "Social and Economic Empowerment of Women in the Age of Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Pakistan, Islamabad- Rawalpindi." Global Social Sciences Review, V.I (2020): 102-111 Print.
    OXFORD : Anzak, Sohima and Sultana, Aneela (2020), "Social and Economic Empowerment of Women in the Age of Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Pakistan, Islamabad- Rawalpindi", Global Social Sciences Review, V (I), 102-111
    TURABIAN : Anzak, Sohima, and Aneela Sultana. "Social and Economic Empowerment of Women in the Age of Digital Literacy: A Case Study of Pakistan, Islamabad- Rawalpindi." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. I (2020): 102-111. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).11