References

• Abercrombie, N. & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences. London: Sage Publications.
• Ainsworth, C. (2015). Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288-291.
• Alhojailan, M. I. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39-47.
• Asal, E. (2019). Gender as hyperreality: Butler's gender through Baudrillard's simulacrum and the case of David Reimer. CULT 501: Social and Cultural Theory
• Badola, R., &Hussain, S. A. (2003). Conflict in Paradise: Women and Protected Areas in the Indian Himalayas. Mountain Research and Development 23 (3), 234-237.
• Bauwel, S. V. (2003). Power, resistance, and subversion: The boundaries of representing gender benders in popular visual culture. Presented at Gender and Power in New Europe, the 5th European Feminist Research Conference August 20-24, Lund University, Sweden.
• Blackstone, A. (2003). Gender roles and society. In Julia R. Miller, Richard M. Lerner, & Lawrence B. Schiamberg (Eds.), Human Ecology: An encyclopedia of children, families, communities, and environments (pp. 335-338). Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO. ISBN I-57607-852-3.
• Brickell, C. (2005). Masculinities, performativity, and subversion a sociological reappraisal. Men and Masculinities, 8(1). Sage Publications. 24-43.
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
• Butler, J. (1996). Gender as performance. In P. Osborne (Ed.), A critical sense: Interviews with intellectuals (pp.109-125). London: Routledge.
• Cameron, J. (1997). Throwing a dish cloth into the works: Troubling theories of domestic labour. Rethinking Marxism 9 (2). 24-44.
• Colfer, C. (2015). The land of stories: Beyond the kingdoms. Little, Brown and Company. New York, Boston.
• Gerson, K. (1993). No man's land: Men's changing commitment to family and work. New York: Basic Books
• Giuliano, P. (2017). Gender: An historical perspective. IZA, Institute of labor economics.
• Gutterman, D. S. (2001). Postmodernism and the interrogation of masculinity. In S. Whitehead & F. Barrett (Eds.), The masculinities reader (pp. 56-72). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
• Hyde J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. Am. Psychol. 60. 581-592.
• Jagger, E. (2000). Consumer bodies. In Hancock, Philip, Hughes, Bill, Elizabeth Jagger, Kevin Paterson, Rachel Russell, Emmanuelle Tuille-Winton and Melissa Tyler (Eds.), The Body, Culture & Society. An Introduction (pp. 45-63). Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Jameson, F. (1995). Postmodernism or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.
• Jones, D. (2000). Gender trouble in the workplace: Language and gender
• Koning, J. (2017). Reimagining gender in a tale as old as time: Gender and narrative play in young adult retellings of
• Marais, A. (2017). Ever other: Unsettling subjects in contemporary revisions of fairy tales (PhD thesis). Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Stellenbosch University.
• McLeod, J. (2011). Qualitative research in counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). University of Oslo, Norway.
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edition). London: SAGE Publications.
• Mirsadjadi, T. S. (2012). Unbreakable glass slippers: Hegemony in Ella Enchanted (Bachelor's thesis). Scripps College.
• Naz, S., Rasheed, M., & Rasheed, T. (2018). Effects of Hindi Dubbed Cartoons on Students' Linguistic Patterns and Culture. Global Language Review (GLR), Vol. III, 126-135. DOI: 10.31703/glr.2018(III-I).08 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2018(III-I).08
• Neculaesei, A. N. (2015). Culture and gender role differences. Cross-Cultural Management, 31-35.
• Neumeier, B. (2013). Gender and fairy tales. Gender Forum, 44.
• Pease, B. (2002). Recreating men: Postmodern masculinity politics. London: Sage.
• Raby, R. (2006). Talking (behind your) back: Young women and resistance. In Y. Jiwani, C. Steenbergen & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Girlhood: Redefining the limits (pp. 138-154). Montreal: Black Rose.
• Rahman, M. (2002). Sexuality and democracy: Identities and strategies in lesbian and gay politics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
• Schacht, S. (2001). Teaching about being an oppressor. Men and Masculinities 4, 2. 201-8.
• Schwabe, C. (2016). The fairy tale and its uses. In Contemporary new media and popular culture. Humanities. Department of Languages, Philosophy and Communication Studies, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
• Schwichtenberg, C. (ed.). (1993). The Madonna connection: Representational politics, subcultural identities, and cultural theory. Oxford: Westview Press.
• Shilling, Chris. (1999). The body and social theory. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
• Stephens, J. & Mccallum, R. A. (2017). Retelling stories, framing culture: Traditional story and metanarratives in children's literature. Isbn: 0-8153-1298-9. Taylor and Francis.
• Vinberg, K. (2012). Fairy tale narratives & notions of gender. In Stephenie Meyer's Twilight Saga and E. L. James' Fifty Shades, Trilogy Literary Seminar English Studies. The Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
• Warner, M. (1995). From the beast to the blonde: On fairy tales and their tellers. London: Chatto&Windus.
• Williams, C. (2012). Re-conceptualizing gender through narrative play in Fairy tales' retellings (PhD thesis). The Graduate Division, University of Hawaii, Manoa.
• Yashkina, S. (2016). Modern fairy tales: The new existence of an old genre (Master's thesis). Institutionen för kulturochestetik Litteraturve tenskap, Stockholms University.
• Zipes, J. (2006). Fairy Tales and the art of subversion: The classical genre for children and the process of civilization. New-York: Routledge.