Abstract
The objectives of the study were focused on the demographic factor-based comparison of stress management skills of university-level teachers. 1362 teachers from faculty of Social Sciences serving in universities of Islamabad were taken as target population for the study. 412 teachers were selected as samples by using stratified sampling technique. Data was collected through a self-developed questionnaire that was based on seven stress management strategies. In accordance with the objectives t-test and ANOVA were applied. Results revealed that university employees with 15-20 years of experience in (Public sector) were more skilled in managing stressful situations. Stress management skills were found better in females than males. Furthermore, teachers serving in public sector universities were found more capable of dealing with stress. The study recommended that top management of educational institutions may redesign their workplace environment as making it more conducive for employees with reference to occupational stress management.
Key Words
Stress Maangement, Job Experience, Gender, Work Experience, Demographic Variation
Introduction
The term “Stress” is denoted with fatigue and feelings of anxieties. Stress is one of the permanent parts of a human’s routine life. In context of workplace, stress is defined as exhaustion in result of excessive workload. At the same time, at workplace, stress may cause improvement, inspiration, and performance of an individual as well (Mathewman, Rose and Hetherington, 2009). This is the stress which is viewed as any burden which surpasses the person's ability to keep up physiological, mental and additionally passionate steadiness (Furnham, 2005). stress was characterized as any outside occasions or inner effort which compromises to agitate the organismic balance (Selye, 1979). A few people have large amounts of resilience for stress and flourish greatly notwithstanding a few stressors in the earth. Then again a few people are not ready to perform well with the exception of when substance to a dimension of stress that enacts or stimulates them to advance their earnest attempts (Sekaran, 2004). This demonstrates when particular contrasts may translate these stressors as positive stress (which intricate them), while other negative stress experiences or distress (which cheapens their endeavors). Such experiences’ impact might be for the current moment and reduce rapidly, another way is to keep going long time (Newstrom, 2007). As per Dura (2002) instructor's job is multifaceted than just passing on information. Distinctive employment-related exercises and undertakings can make stress among the instructors. Kyriako (2001) revealed substantial outstanding burden alongside terrible conduct as key stressors for educators. Boyle, Borg, Falzon, and Baglioni (1995) recognized that troublesome understudies' conduct is the principle stressor for educators that compromises their order and control. These stressors can seriously influence classroom execution and passionate soundness of the educator (Greenwood, Olenjnik and Parkay, 1990; Yoon, 2002). Concentrates on occupation stress have featured the effect of stress on representative wellbeing Jonge, Bosma, Diminish and Siegrist, 2000; Kudielka, Hanebuth, Känel, Gander, Grande, and Fischer, 2005). Instructors who have poor adapting aptitudes have more truancy at occupation and have more odds of leaving their showing vocation (Thickets, 2004). Noor and Ismail (2016) announced very critical effect of college educators' work stress as it influenced the instructors themselves, yet in addition their understudies.
Statement of Problem
In the present research the researcher’s main focus is to compare the stress management skills of teachers in three dimensions; teaching experience, gender and university type (public & private)
Literature Review
Due to globalization education sector also faces lots of challenges and opportunities. These challenges and opportunities sometimes create pressure on educational managers as well as on teachers. Initially, the term “Stress” was identified by Smith and Milstein in 1930 and later on in 1955. For the first time the history of changes in educational process and impact of these changes on teacher’s stress was documented by Travers and Cooper. Job productivity effects in a negative way due to rapid changes in the field of education system across the world (Alberta Teachers’ Association, 2011) Furthermore, a study conducted by Johnson et al. in (2005) they compare teaching profession with 25 topmost challenging professions adopted by the professionals, their study showed a very interesting and quite amazing results, they conclude that teaching profession is a 2nd most stressful profession.
As per an investigation by Pettigrew and Wolf, directed in (1982), there are two sorts of stress which are which may, at last, have an effect on educators: stress depends on work-related errands and stress-dependent on the work environment job. Stress dependent on work associated duties, for example, managing disobedient learners, addresses the issues related to various explicit assignments that educators must execute as a component of their occupation and expected set of responsibilities. Stress dependent on the working environment tasks, for example, absence of vital assets for appropriate instructing, alludes to how the desires for educators about their job in the work environment fit with their genuine obligations that are vital for instructors to satisfy their jobs.
Stress can be depicted as the unfriendly response, individuals need to extreme burden or different sorts of interest attacking them at the same time (Health & Safety Executive, 2005). Thus, the type of occupation can decide itself the sort, level, and intensity of stress. That stress can be actuated. Numerous employments may be viewed as stressful, yet does not really imply that they will affect a person's mental prosperity.
University worker assumes a fundamental job is the creation and scattering of information and advancement in addition to educational growth and development, especially at teaching sector. The above-quoted research showed that large amounts of work-related stress, whenever remained unchecked and unmanaged, will weaken the final product in terms quality, quantity, and Creativity of employee’s work and workers' prosperity (Gillispie et al., 2001).
Coping is portrayed as the contemplations and practices utilized to deal with the inward and outer requests of circumstances that are assessed as stressful or surpassing the assets of the individual (Folkman, 2000 & Lazarus, 1993). An individual or family to watch involvement, characterize, comprehend, or potentially act in light of a testing knowledge (Dyk, & Schvaneveldt, 1987). Through factor examination portrayed four kinds of adapting systems: 1) Active Avoidance Coping: Dynamic Evasion Adapting procedures seem to reflect dynamic endeavor to avoid stress indicators or escape from its liabilities. 2) Problem Focused Adapting: Issue, Concentrated Adapting procedures depend on dynamic adapting, arranging, looking for instrumental social help, and looking for enthusiastic social help scale. This methodology used a dynamic endeavor for dispensing with the stressor or its impact. 3) Positive Coping: Optimistic Adapting comprises of utilization of silliness and positive reframing and enthusiastic social help. The method exerts to receive positive adapting systems. 4) Refusal Adapting: Denial Adapting depends on religious practice if there should arise an occurrence of stress or troublesome circumstance and denies the truth (Hastings, et.al. 2005)
There are many studies addressing these coping techniques with reference to different demographic variations (sexual orientation, work involvement) which were directed by numerous significant analysts; found critical distinction among females & males instructors in utilization of problem-centered coping component and demonstrated that the male contrasted with the female educators had higher issue centered managing system (Mohammadi, Danesh, and Shejwal, 2009). According to Sud, and Sharma (n.d) Male educators had been observed to utilize some other problems centered coping systems and females had been observed to utilize more feeling centered coping techniques. Ladies got altogether higher scores as compared to gents on the basis of emotional and avoidance styles and less score on separation and objective coping (M. P., 2004.) It was additionally discovered that males scored higher on emotional restraint than the ladies. There is a huge contrast among males and females as far as commitment to coping procedures and academic performance. Lawrence, Ashford, & Dent, (2006) said that especially, guys uncovered more noteworthy capacity to disengage themselves from the emotions of a circumstance, and were progressively disposed to show emotional hindrance or overturning of sentiments.
Struthers et al. (2000) justified problem-centered as most important stress managing techniques (practically identical to Dombeck's methodology technique) that actually made people more confident and logical in their performances. They further highlighted emotional way out as better option after problem-centered approach (practically identical to Dombeck's shirking approach), which they considered being increasingly impeding to individual drive and resulting scholarly execution. Symptoms of emotional dominance for the sake of stress management incorporates eating more and crying (Klinic People group Wellbeing Center, 2010; National Foundation of Psychological wellness, 2003). As indicated by Adam and Epel (2007) people having more eating habits as method for managing stress really use nourishment to actuate their physiological reward framework; they keep on utilizing this technique since they start to feel better. Donatelle (2012) structures the positive stress-free option of crying which leads that men may have diverse methods for dealing with stress (Misra and Castillo, 2004). Suppose, ladies will in general showcase their sentiments all the more obviously/transparently, and more established (instead of more youthful) men are bound to cry before their friends and family (Fox, 2004).
According to Gudrun et al. (2012) is of the opinion that socialization goes about as a stress cradle. In any case, an excess of socialization can be hindering (Swim et al., 2011) and can result in diversion, net bungle of time, and expanded stress.
Research Objectives
1. To compare university teachers’ stress management strategies on the basis of their gender.
2. To compare university teachers’ stress management strategies on the basis of their university wise.
3. To compare university teachers’ stress management strategies on the basis of their work experience
Research Hypotheses
H01: There is no significant difference among university teachers’ stress management strategies with reference to their gender
H02: There is no significant difference among university teachers’ stress management strategies with reference to their university types (public & private)
H03: There is no significant difference among university teachers’ stress management strategies with reference to their work experience
The Rationale of the Study
In this advance and dynamic era, life is becoming too fast. Everyone is approaching life targets in a very sharp, quick and crisp manner. Ultimately, this change in lifestyle and thinking approach is greatly affecting workplace scenarios as well. Organizations are eventually converting into machine with their more efficient goals, speedy executions, competitive environment, and predefined unique outputs. Current, organizational structures and expectations pose a heavy load of high-quality work performed on the shoulders of workers. Fast and technological advancements are challenge for employees’ skills and abilities now a day. At the same time, along with the benefits and learning, employees are facing multiple kinds of stress at workplaces. Stress is like a threat to both employees’ personal and professional growth. For the sake of employees’ job satisfaction, mental health, motivation and professional grooming stress management is unavoidable. In this context, this study was framed for university teachers with special emphasis to assess their abilities to cope up with occupational stress management. It is assumed that the extent they will be equipped with stress management skills, can be sustained at workplace successfully.
Significance of The Study
Teaching is no longer merely hard work; it has become a highly stressful profession. The nature and organization of work make teaching very difficult. Professors face new challenges and opportunities for the student's population is increasingly diverse and needy. The demand for faculty members in developing new knowledge and skills to perform new tasks rapidly for student’s development. This often leads to overwhelming pressures and challenges for the faculty, which consequently leads to conflict and stress.
Educators in advanced educational systems can better equip themselves through this study. Furthermore, they can save their mental, physical, personal and social life from dangerous effects of occupational stress.
Management of an educational organization can also get an idea of reshaping employee (teachers) behavior by addressing their core issues on priority basis. Stress-free attitude may enrich employee performance therefore top management of higher education institutes may treat teachers on the basis of their stress types.
Teacher training programs need to be refurbished with reference to theory and practices in light of stress management skill development among teachers at all levels.
Executive bodies/policymakers may consult the study for the estimation and facilitation of teachers at higher education levels incorporating findings of the study regarding occupational stress.
Delimitation
Keeping in view all the resources, time and procedures necessary for holding this study following aspects were considered as boundaries;
• Teaching faculty serving in Faculty of Social Sciences
• Teaching faculty serving in universities situated in Islamabad city
• Both public and private HEIs
• Comparative analysis of respondents’ stress management skills
Methodology
Research
Design
A descriptive type of research
was picked for this study because of its main theme, “exploration of university
teachers’ stress management strategies”. For the sake of possibly accurate
information gathering and drawing tangible conclusion, quantitative approach
was applied to the data.
Population
A total 15 universities from
both sectors (public & private) as per data available on the official
website of Higher Education Commission (2017) exiting in territory of Islamabad
only were focused as participants of the study. Targeted universities (15) were
comprised of eleven (11) universities from public sector while other four
universities were taken from private sector. Further, all the employees working
in Faculty of Social Sciences from the above-mentioned universities were chosen
as population of the study. Data provided by HEC (2017) faculty of social
sciences was 1375 in both sectors (public sector = 765, private sector = 610)
Sampling
In the present study as
mentioned above, the population consisted of university teachers serving in
faculty of Social Sciences from both kinds of universities of Islamabad (public
& private). Public sector teachers were bit more in numbers (765) than
private sector (610). For the sake of stress management skill assessment,
stratifies sampling technique was used. Type of universities was considered as
strata (public & private) 412 teachers (30%) were taken as desired samples
of the study (229 from public and 183 teachers from private sector).
Table 1.
Description of Sample Size of the Study
University Type -wise
Teachers from FSS (30%) |
Male
(110) |
Female
(119) |
Sample
Size (27%
out of 30%) |
Public Universities Teachers (229) |
93 |
98 |
191/229 |
Private University Teachers (183) |
89 |
90 |
179/183 |
Total Sample size Sector-wise (412) |
182 |
188 |
370 /412 |
Note: from respondents, the rate of
return was 27%
Data
Collection Tool
In this study survey method
was used and the questionnaire opted as study instrument. This research tool
was based on coping strategies. Focused stress management strategies were taken
out of thorough study of following researches and related literature about
stress management.
Table 2.
Studies Consulted in Tool Development
Year |
Researcher |
Study Title |
2012 |
Jan Richards |
Teacher Stress and Coping
Strategies: A National Snapshot |
2011 |
Jeffrey Sprenger |
Anxiety and their control over
approaches |
2010 |
Ying Ming Lin &FarnShing Chen, 2010 |
Strain regulating tool for
higher education students |
1984-2001 |
David L.Tobin |
Employer Guidebook for the Managing
Approaches |
The questionnaire was finally included stress management
strategies given below.
1. Physical Rest
2. Pray/Mediation
3. Problem-Solving
4. Compensating Attitude
5. Positive Attitude
6. Denial/Refusal
7. Social support
The questionnaire as study
tool was considered reliable .89 at Cronbach alpha.
Data
Analysis
The vital part of the study
was the analysis of the obtained data. For making is more and more reliable and
worthwhile, as a first step data was collected through personal involvement of
the researcher. Later on, careful scrutiny was done for seriously, responsibly
and completely filled questionnaires from respondents which were 370. For
extracting and interpreting data, Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS) v.20 was incorporated. In accordance with the nature of objectives, two
tests of statistics named as t-test and ANOVA were applied.
Results
Table 3.
Stress Management Strategies
(Gender-Wise)
Variable
|
Groups |
Respondents (N) |
Mean Value |
t-value |
df |
Sig. |
Stress Management Strategies |
Male
Female
|
182
188 |
199.53
202.23 |
1.019 |
368 |
.30 |
*p< 0.05 **p<0.01
Gender-based
comparison of university teaching faculty with reference to their strategies of
stress management was carried out. According to table above,no significant
difference was found between male (M=199.53) and female (M=202.23,) teachers; t
(368) = -1.019, p = .30. Results reflected that female and male teachers were
used to adopt stress management strategies at their workplace.
Table 4. Comparison among University
Teachers (University Type-Wise)
Variable
|
Groups |
Respondents (N) |
Mean |
t-value |
Df |
Sig. |
Stress Management Strategies |
Public
Private |
191
179 |
205.18
180.76 |
8.291 |
368 |
.001 |
*p<0.05 **p<0.01
Comparison
among university teachers’ Stress Management Strategies was done on the basis
of their university types. Results showed a significant difference among
teachers of both public and private universities like teachers (M=205.18) and
Private sector university teachers (M=180.76) teachers; t (368) = 8.291,
P-value = .00. Results discovered that Public
sector university teachers were better stress managers in comparison with
private sector university teachers.
Table 5.
Comparison among University Teachers’ Stress Management Strategies
(Work-Experience Wise)
Variable |
Groups |
Respondents (N) |
Mean |
t-value |
Df |
Sig. |
Stress Management Strategies
|
1-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 Total |
185 97 47 37 04 370 |
198.45 203.63 198.30 217.08 213.00 200.43 |
2.384 |
365 |
.05 |
*p<0.05, **p<0.01
Comparison carried out among
teachers of universities with reference to their stress management strategies
on basis of work experience. The difference between teachers’ stress management
strategies was significant (p = .05). Furthermore, employees with teaching
experience of 15-20 having mean value (217.08) declared them more efficient
stress managers while teachers with experience of 10-15 years considered low-stress
management strategies.
Conclusion
The study was initiated with the aim of stress management strategies assessment among teaching faculty, serving in both public and private universities of Islamabad. In this context, a comparative analysis was done on multiple bases. Quantitative analysis of data reflected following conclusions;
Results highlighted that both males and females were used to incorporate strategies from given options for making themselves free from stress equally. No significant difference was established between both genders. It is evident that everyone wants to release stress through possible tactics.
As far as university type-wise comparison is concerned, teachers from public sector universities were more habitual in terms of stress management. In light of results, finding that stress managing strategies were comparatively more practiced by public sector employees leads towards stressful work environment in public universities.
The third indicator of stress management taken for this study was work experience. Five commonly available ranges of work experiences were incorporated into the study for analysis. Out of those five ranges, stress management strategies were significantly more in practice of teachers having 15 to 20 years of experience. It shows that they were more capable to use strategies with ease. While other employees like teachers with 10 to 15 years of experience were less customized with stress coping strategies offered to them.
Discussion
Faculty from public and private universities of Islamabad was targeted as an investigation group for the study aimed at stress managing technique assessment. For data accumulation researcher constructed a poll after broad investigation of various researches with respect to techniques of stress handling. The examination was comparative in nature. The study based on comparative assessment was done through respondent’s gender, university type, and work related experience. Data was gathered through survey technique. Related literature and statistical package for social studies (SPSS) were consulted for data interpretation. The investigation was grounded on three objectives which introduced the reason for study. For examining every factor of the investigation, a thorough analysis of hypotheses was carried out.
An investigation initiated by Vingerhoets and Van Hell (1990) revealed that men are bound to opt issue-centered strategy of stress management mostly like; arranging and justifying their activities, positive reasoning, assurance, adjustment, and advancement. While on the other side, females usually prefer to use feeling-centered options like; self-accusing and unrealistic reasoning as stress management strategies.
Results also found out that teachers having more job experience were excellent in terms of stress coping as compared to newly induct workforce in universities. Various studies strengthened the findings of this research, (Gold, Y., & Roth,R.A. 1993) likewise concluded that newly induct teachers seem like to be extra defenseless to the pressures of the job as compared to experienced teachers. Maylor (2001) provided details regarding moderately youthful educators who experienced such abnormal state of stress and tension that they considered suicide. Nagel and Dark (1989) found that educators with five to ten years' experience felt more stress than old age instructors with more experience. A comparative study led by Qadir (2017) on postgraduate educators found that female encouraging personnel was better at coping stress at their workplace as contrast with male instructors. Her discoveries likewise demonstrate that instructors having 20-25 years appreciate work at work spot and their own life at home. Similarly Martin and Toms (2004) coordinated that Men of any institution may have marginally abnormal amounts of stressed male than female administrators.
Stress at the workplace is commonly observed phenomenon in booth kinds of organizations private and public. But important thing is to deal with the stress which indirectly connected with workplace environment also. In this context, comparison between employees of both sectors of universities was also incorporated in the study. The reason behind this finding was, maybe job insecurity, heavy workload and frequent changes in policies give stress to workers. According to the study of Hussain, Kumar, & Husain, (2008) degree of educational stress was significantly greater among the non-public school understudies whereas Government school understudies were significantly better as far as their dimension of alteration coping methodologies. Another investigation identified with the conclusion of this examination which was directed by Tomar.et.al (2014) they cleared up that understudies expected to experience the effects of extreme mental syndromes were 3% in private school and 2% in government school because of their scholastic pressure, association with guardians and companions.
Recommendations
1. The nature of work assignments may be delegated according to employees’ gender specifications.
2. Short but frequent training sessions need to be conducted on stress management tactics by both public and private universities.
3. Employees working in public universities found more engaged in stress management activities which in fact reflected that they were facing more stressful situations. In this context, public university management needs to be more sensitive about their employee's work environment.
4. The transparent and justified monitoring system may be introduced in public universities for measuring work performances. And employees may be acknowledged accordingly.
5. Work assignments may be given to beginners in the form of team; they may be attached to seniors for learning mature experiences.
6. Lastly, there is a recommendation for recreational programs that should be regular part of organizational calendar. Excursion trips, get-to-gather function, teamwork, competitions provide energetic and refreshing feelings.
References
- Alberta Teachers'Association. (2011). The Courage to Choose: Emerging Trends and Strategic Possibilities for Informed Transformation in Alberta Schools 2010-2011. Edmonton: Alta.
- Brougham, R. R., Zail, C. M., Mendoza, C. M., & Miller, J. R. (2009). Stress, sex differences, and coping strategies among college students. Current Psychology, 28(2) 85-97
- Chaturvedi, M., & Purushothaman, T. (2009). Coping behavior of female teachers: Demographic determinants. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(1): 36-38
- Dyk, P. A. H., & Schvaneveldt, J. D. (1987). Coping as a concept in family theory. Family Science Review, 1(1): 23-40,
- Folkman, S. & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55(6):647-654,
- Gold, Y., & Roth, R. A. (1993). Teachers managing stress and preventing burnout: The professional health solution. London: The Falmer Press.
- Groeschl, T., & Wetenkamp, J., (2001). Experience vs. inexperience: Teacher perception of male and female students' behavior. Teacher Perception of Male and Female Students' Behavior, 51-56,
- Hastings, R. P., Kovshoff, H., Brown, T., Ward, N. J., Espinosa, F. D., & Remington, B. (2005). Coping strategies in mothers and fathers of preschool and school age children with autism. Autism, 9(4): 377-391
- Hung, C-L. (2012). Job stress and coping strategies among early childhood teachers in Central Taiwan. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(23): 494-501
- Hussain, A., Kumar, A., & Husain, A. (2008). Academic Stress and Adjustment Among High School Students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34(Special Issue); 70-73.
- Johnson, S., Cooper, C., Cartwright, S., Donald, T.P., & Millet, C. (2005). The Experience of Work-Related Stress across Occupations. Journal of Managerial Psychology. ;20(2):178-187.
- Kahraman, N., & Sungur, S. (2011). Investigating Turkish middle school students' coping strategies in science. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 263-268
- Khan, M. I., Khan, A., & Khan, S. (2006). Coping strategies among male and female teachers with high and low job strain. In A. Husain, & M. I. Khan, (Eds.). Recent Trends in Human Stress Management. Global Vision Publishing House, New Delhi, 181-189
Cite this article
-
APA : Nudrat, S., Hina, Q. u. a., & Zamir, S. (2019). Demographic Variation and Stress Management Skills. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(IV), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).27
-
CHICAGO : Nudrat, Saira, Qurat ul ain Hina, and Shazia Zamir. 2019. "Demographic Variation and Stress Management Skills." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV): 209-216 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).27
-
HARVARD : NUDRAT, S., HINA, Q. U. A. & ZAMIR, S. 2019. Demographic Variation and Stress Management Skills. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 209-216.
-
MHRA : Nudrat, Saira, Qurat ul ain Hina, and Shazia Zamir. 2019. "Demographic Variation and Stress Management Skills." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 209-216
-
MLA : Nudrat, Saira, Qurat ul ain Hina, and Shazia Zamir. "Demographic Variation and Stress Management Skills." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.IV (2019): 209-216 Print.
-
OXFORD : Nudrat, Saira, Hina, Qurat ul ain, and Zamir, Shazia (2019), "Demographic Variation and Stress Management Skills", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV), 209-216
-
TURABIAN : Nudrat, Saira, Qurat ul ain Hina, and Shazia Zamir. "Demographic Variation and Stress Management Skills." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. IV (2019): 209-216. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).27