CHINAS CONTEMPORARY FOREIGN POLICY BEHAVIOR AN ANALYSIS THROUGH REALIST LIBERAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE PERSPECTIVES

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : AsifFarooq , UmbreenJavaid

31 Pages : 238-244

References

  • Acharya, A. (2007). Theoretical Perspectives on International Relations in Asia. In Shambaugh, D., & Yahuda, M. (Eds.). (2008). International relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Art, R. J. (2010). The United States and the rise of China: implications for the long haul. Political Science Quarterly, 125(3), 359-391.
  • Bernstein, R., & Munro, R. H. (1997). The coming conflict with America. Foreign Affairs, 76(2) 18-32.
  • Chernoff, F. (2007). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: concepts and contending accounts. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Doyle, M. W. (2005). Three pillars of the liberal peace. American political science review, 99(3), 463-466
  • Funabashi, Y., Oksenberg, M. and Weiss, H., 1994. An Emerging China in a World of Interdependence, The Trilateral Commission, New York.
  • Goswami, N. (2013). Power shifts in East Asia: Balance of Power vs Liberal Institutionalism. Perceptions, 18(1), 3.
  • Griffith, S. B. (1963). Sun Tzu: The art of war (Vol. 39). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Holsti, O. R. (2004). Theories of international relations. Explaining the history of American foreign relations, 2, 384.
  • Hongyi, L. (2010). The domestic sources of China's foreign policy: Regimes, leadership, priorities and process. Routledge.
  • Houghton, D. P. (2007). Reinvigorating the study of foreign policy decision making: toward a constructivist approach. Foreign policy analysis, 3(1), 24-45.
  • Hudda, N. (2015). Interpreting the Rise of China: Realist and Liberalist Perspectives'. E International Relations.
  • Jiechi, Y. (2013). Innovations in China's Diplomatic Theory and Practice under New Conditions. Ministry of Foreign Affairs website, August, 16.
  • Kagan, D. (1969). The outbreak of the Peloponnesian War (Vol. 1). Cornell University Press
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.
  • Kegley, C, W., & Blanton, S. L. (2011).
  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1998). Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign affairs, 81-94.
  • Khan, A., Ahmad, A., & Dadda, A. A. (2017). Pak-US Relations: Understanding of the Misunderstandings. Global Social Science Review, 2(2), 1-23.
  • Khan, A., & Ahmad, A. (January 2018). Organized Crimes and Governance Gap in the Conflict Affected NorthWestern Pakistan Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 84-98
  • Kissinger, H. (2012), On China. The Penguin Press, New York, USA.
  • Kubalkova, V. (2015). Foreign policy in a constructed world. Routledge.
  • Kubalkova, V., Onuf, N., & Kowert, P. (Eds.) (1998). Constructing constructivism. In International relations in a constructed world, M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
  • Layne, C. (2008). China's challenge to US hegemony. Current History-New York Then Philadelphia 107(705), 13.
  • Lee, J. (2007). The Rise of China: An Introduction. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs 20(1), 1-4.
  • Lieberthal, K. (1995). A New China Strategy: The Challenge, Foreign Affairs, November/December 74(6): 35-49.
  • Liu, Q. (2010). China's Rise and Regional Strategy: Power, Interdependence and Identity. Journal of Cambridge Studies.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The future of the American pacifier. Foreign Affairs, 46-61.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2006). China's unpeaceful rise. Current History-New York Then Philadelphia, 105(690), 160.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1965). We are deluding ourselves in Vietnam. New York Times Magazine, 18.
  • Parks, T. (Trans.). (2009). Niccolò Machiavelli: The Prince. Penguin.
  • Pugh, J. (2005). Democratic Peace Theory: A review and evaluation. CEMPROC Occasional Paper Series.
  • Qin, Y. (2011). Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(2), 231-257.
  • Reus-smit, C. (2005). Constructivism. In Burchill, S. (et al.), Theories of International Relations, 3rd Ed. (p.199). Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Rosecrance, R. (1999). The Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming Century. New York, Basic Book.
  • Roy, D. (2003). China's reaction to American predominance. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 45(3), 57-78.
  • Russett, B. (1994). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton university press.
  • Scott, D. (2008). 'The Chinese Century'?: The Challenge to Global Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shambaugh, D., & Yahuda, M. (Eds.). (2008). International relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Slaughter, A. M. (2011). International relations, principal theories. In Wolfrum, R. (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international Law (p.129). Oxford University Press.
  • Thucydides, Warner, R., & Finley, M. I. (1972). Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian war. Penguin.
  • Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46(2), 391-425.
  • Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American political science review, 88(2), 384-396.
  • Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing international politics. International security, 20(1), 71-81.
  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

References

  • Acharya, A. (2007). Theoretical Perspectives on International Relations in Asia. In Shambaugh, D., & Yahuda, M. (Eds.). (2008). International relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Art, R. J. (2010). The United States and the rise of China: implications for the long haul. Political Science Quarterly, 125(3), 359-391.
  • Bernstein, R., & Munro, R. H. (1997). The coming conflict with America. Foreign Affairs, 76(2) 18-32.
  • Chernoff, F. (2007). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: concepts and contending accounts. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Doyle, M. W. (2005). Three pillars of the liberal peace. American political science review, 99(3), 463-466
  • Funabashi, Y., Oksenberg, M. and Weiss, H., 1994. An Emerging China in a World of Interdependence, The Trilateral Commission, New York.
  • Goswami, N. (2013). Power shifts in East Asia: Balance of Power vs Liberal Institutionalism. Perceptions, 18(1), 3.
  • Griffith, S. B. (1963). Sun Tzu: The art of war (Vol. 39). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Holsti, O. R. (2004). Theories of international relations. Explaining the history of American foreign relations, 2, 384.
  • Hongyi, L. (2010). The domestic sources of China's foreign policy: Regimes, leadership, priorities and process. Routledge.
  • Houghton, D. P. (2007). Reinvigorating the study of foreign policy decision making: toward a constructivist approach. Foreign policy analysis, 3(1), 24-45.
  • Hudda, N. (2015). Interpreting the Rise of China: Realist and Liberalist Perspectives'. E International Relations.
  • Jiechi, Y. (2013). Innovations in China's Diplomatic Theory and Practice under New Conditions. Ministry of Foreign Affairs website, August, 16.
  • Kagan, D. (1969). The outbreak of the Peloponnesian War (Vol. 1). Cornell University Press
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.
  • Kegley, C, W., & Blanton, S. L. (2011).
  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1998). Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign affairs, 81-94.
  • Khan, A., Ahmad, A., & Dadda, A. A. (2017). Pak-US Relations: Understanding of the Misunderstandings. Global Social Science Review, 2(2), 1-23.
  • Khan, A., & Ahmad, A. (January 2018). Organized Crimes and Governance Gap in the Conflict Affected NorthWestern Pakistan Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 84-98
  • Kissinger, H. (2012), On China. The Penguin Press, New York, USA.
  • Kubalkova, V. (2015). Foreign policy in a constructed world. Routledge.
  • Kubalkova, V., Onuf, N., & Kowert, P. (Eds.) (1998). Constructing constructivism. In International relations in a constructed world, M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
  • Layne, C. (2008). China's challenge to US hegemony. Current History-New York Then Philadelphia 107(705), 13.
  • Lee, J. (2007). The Rise of China: An Introduction. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs 20(1), 1-4.
  • Lieberthal, K. (1995). A New China Strategy: The Challenge, Foreign Affairs, November/December 74(6): 35-49.
  • Liu, Q. (2010). China's Rise and Regional Strategy: Power, Interdependence and Identity. Journal of Cambridge Studies.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The future of the American pacifier. Foreign Affairs, 46-61.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2006). China's unpeaceful rise. Current History-New York Then Philadelphia, 105(690), 160.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1965). We are deluding ourselves in Vietnam. New York Times Magazine, 18.
  • Parks, T. (Trans.). (2009). Niccolò Machiavelli: The Prince. Penguin.
  • Pugh, J. (2005). Democratic Peace Theory: A review and evaluation. CEMPROC Occasional Paper Series.
  • Qin, Y. (2011). Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(2), 231-257.
  • Reus-smit, C. (2005). Constructivism. In Burchill, S. (et al.), Theories of International Relations, 3rd Ed. (p.199). Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Rosecrance, R. (1999). The Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming Century. New York, Basic Book.
  • Roy, D. (2003). China's reaction to American predominance. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 45(3), 57-78.
  • Russett, B. (1994). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton university press.
  • Scott, D. (2008). 'The Chinese Century'?: The Challenge to Global Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shambaugh, D., & Yahuda, M. (Eds.). (2008). International relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Slaughter, A. M. (2011). International relations, principal theories. In Wolfrum, R. (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international Law (p.129). Oxford University Press.
  • Thucydides, Warner, R., & Finley, M. I. (1972). Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian war. Penguin.
  • Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46(2), 391-425.
  • Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American political science review, 88(2), 384-396.
  • Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing international politics. International security, 20(1), 71-81.
  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Farooq, A., & Javaid, U. (2019). China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(II), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. 2019. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II): 238-244 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31

HARVARD

    HARVARD : FAROOQ, A. & JAVAID, U. 2019. China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 238-244.

MHRA

    MHRA : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. 2019. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 238-244

MLA

    MLA : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.II (2019): 238-244 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Farooq, Asif and Javaid, Umbreen (2019), "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II), 238-244

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. II (2019): 238-244. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31